福建警察学院学报
福建警察學院學報
복건경찰학원학보
JOURNAL OF FUJIAN POLICE ACADEMY
2015年
3期
102-108
,共7页
刑事和解协议%刑罚权主体%审查内容
刑事和解協議%刑罰權主體%審查內容
형사화해협의%형벌권주체%심사내용
the criminal reconciliation contract%the body having the penalty power%reviewing content
刑事和解协议属于效力待定的“公私兼合”的契约形式,被害方和加害方享有缔约权和请求权,行使刑罚权的公权力主体享有提议、审查和监督权。该审查决定程序是刑事和解协议的生效要件,不但具有独立的程序意义,也具有实体法上的意义。对该协议的审查包括了对“自愿性”和“合法性”的审查。
刑事和解協議屬于效力待定的“公私兼閤”的契約形式,被害方和加害方享有締約權和請求權,行使刑罰權的公權力主體享有提議、審查和鑑督權。該審查決定程序是刑事和解協議的生效要件,不但具有獨立的程序意義,也具有實體法上的意義。對該協議的審查包括瞭對“自願性”和“閤法性”的審查。
형사화해협의속우효력대정적“공사겸합”적계약형식,피해방화가해방향유체약권화청구권,행사형벌권적공권력주체향유제의、심사화감독권。해심사결정정서시형사화해협의적생효요건,불단구유독립적정서의의,야구유실체법상적의의。대해협의적심사포괄료대“자원성”화“합법성”적심사。
The criminal reconciliation contract is a both-public-and-private contract, and its effect is to be determined. For such a contract, both the offender and the victim have the rights to form it and to ask the judiciary to review it. In fact, the body having the penalty power can propose a motion, then review and supervise how it is done. The reviewing procedure from the judiciary is necessary for an effective contract, and it has both the proce-dural and subtantive values. Besides, the review involves the "voluntary" and the "legitimacy" of the contract.