福建警察学院学报
福建警察學院學報
복건경찰학원학보
JOURNAL OF FUJIAN POLICE ACADEMY
2015年
3期
85-90
,共6页
商业秘密%重大损失%数额认定
商業祕密%重大損失%數額認定
상업비밀%중대손실%수액인정
commercial secrets%significant loss%identifying the amount of money
重大损失是构成侵犯商业秘密罪的必--件，在理论界有关其认定众说纷纭。就标准而言，主要有“权利人同期利润的减少说”“侵权人的侵权所得说”“商业秘密的评估价值说”三种认定方式，却未能形成认定体系。在司法实践中，一方面以现有标准为基点，调序适用；另一方面区分行为，对标准分类适用，以此构建数额认定标准的二维模式，才能准确认定数额。
重大損失是構成侵犯商業祕密罪的必--件，在理論界有關其認定衆說紛紜。就標準而言，主要有“權利人同期利潤的減少說”“侵權人的侵權所得說”“商業祕密的評估價值說”三種認定方式，卻未能形成認定體繫。在司法實踐中，一方麵以現有標準為基點，調序適用；另一方麵區分行為，對標準分類適用，以此構建數額認定標準的二維模式，纔能準確認定數額。
중대손실시구성침범상업비밀죄적필--건，재이론계유관기인정음설분운。취표준이언，주요유“권리인동기리윤적감소설”“침권인적침권소득설”“상업비밀적평고개치설”삼충인정방식，각미능형성인정체계。재사법실천중，일방면이현유표준위기점，조서괄용；령일방면구분행위，대표준분류괄용，이차구건수액인정표준적이유모식，재능준학인정수액。
Significant loss is one of the necessary elements to constitute the commercial espionage, and no one agrees on how to identify it in the theoretical field. In respect of standards, there are three different theories:"the-ory about the decreasing profit of the commercial owner over the same period","theory about how much the infrin-ging person has got","theory about assessed value of trade secrets". Yet these theories can not form a system. Therefore, in judicial practice, on the one hand, we should adjust the current standards; on the other hand, we should apply standards to different behaviors, in order to set up a two-dimensional mode about identifying the a-mount of money obtained in commercial espionage. Only in this way, can the amount be accurate.
