农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
16期
71-77
,共7页
资丹%王福军%姚志峰%侯亚康%肖若富%何成连%阳恩宝
資丹%王福軍%姚誌峰%侯亞康%肖若富%何成連%暘恩寶
자단%왕복군%요지봉%후아강%초약부%하성련%양은보
泵%数值分析%模型%泵站%前池%导流墩%整流
泵%數值分析%模型%泵站%前池%導流墩%整流
빙%수치분석%모형%빙참%전지%도류돈%정류
pumps%numerical analysis%models%pumping station%fore-bay%division pier%flow rectification
大型泵站前池和进水池经常存在表面旋涡和附壁涡,从而影响水泵运行稳定性。而由于大型泵站的尺度大,单一型式的导流墩很难改善这类泵站的进水流场。该文以广东省永湖泵站为研究对象,采用数值计算和现场测试相结合的方法,研究了组合式导流墩在改善大型泵站前池、进水池流态方面的效果,构建了由八字型导流墩、川字型导流墩和十字型消涡板相结合的组合式导流墩。三维流体动力学计算发现,组合式导流墩利用前端的八字型导流墩降低前池扩散角,减弱前池大尺度表面旋涡,借助后续的川字型导流墩调整流动均匀度,将水流均匀导入进水池,再通过水泵吸水喇叭管下部的十字型消涡板去除水泵吸水喇叭管周边的附底涡,提高流速分布均匀度,经计算喇叭管底面、水泵进口断面流速分布均匀度分别提高了7.8%、10.6%。实际测试表明,组合式导流墩将水泵最大压力脉动降低17.1%,将水泵振动由 D区降低到C区,达到水泵技术标准规定的振动要求,保证了泵站的安全稳定运行。该研究对大型泵站建设提供了参考。
大型泵站前池和進水池經常存在錶麵鏇渦和附壁渦,從而影響水泵運行穩定性。而由于大型泵站的呎度大,單一型式的導流墩很難改善這類泵站的進水流場。該文以廣東省永湖泵站為研究對象,採用數值計算和現場測試相結閤的方法,研究瞭組閤式導流墩在改善大型泵站前池、進水池流態方麵的效果,構建瞭由八字型導流墩、川字型導流墩和十字型消渦闆相結閤的組閤式導流墩。三維流體動力學計算髮現,組閤式導流墩利用前耑的八字型導流墩降低前池擴散角,減弱前池大呎度錶麵鏇渦,藉助後續的川字型導流墩調整流動均勻度,將水流均勻導入進水池,再通過水泵吸水喇叭管下部的十字型消渦闆去除水泵吸水喇叭管週邊的附底渦,提高流速分佈均勻度,經計算喇叭管底麵、水泵進口斷麵流速分佈均勻度分彆提高瞭7.8%、10.6%。實際測試錶明,組閤式導流墩將水泵最大壓力脈動降低17.1%,將水泵振動由 D區降低到C區,達到水泵技術標準規定的振動要求,保證瞭泵站的安全穩定運行。該研究對大型泵站建設提供瞭參攷。
대형빙참전지화진수지경상존재표면선와화부벽와,종이영향수빙운행은정성。이유우대형빙참적척도대,단일형식적도류돈흔난개선저류빙참적진수류장。해문이광동성영호빙참위연구대상,채용수치계산화현장측시상결합적방법,연구료조합식도류돈재개선대형빙참전지、진수지류태방면적효과,구건료유팔자형도류돈、천자형도류돈화십자형소와판상결합적조합식도류돈。삼유류체동역학계산발현,조합식도류돈이용전단적팔자형도류돈강저전지확산각,감약전지대척도표면선와,차조후속적천자형도류돈조정류동균균도,장수류균균도입진수지,재통과수빙흡수나팔관하부적십자형소와판거제수빙흡수나팔관주변적부저와,제고류속분포균균도,경계산나팔관저면、수빙진구단면류속분포균균도분별제고료7.8%、10.6%。실제측시표명,조합식도류돈장수빙최대압력맥동강저17.1%,장수빙진동유 D구강저도C구,체도수빙기술표준규정적진동요구,보증료빙참적안전은정운행。해연구대대형빙참건설제공료삼고。
Surface vortex and submerged vortex originating from intake wall often exist in fore-bay and sump in a large-scale pumping station. These vortices may affect the stability of pump operation. Because of big dimension, single diversion pier cannot effectively improve the intake flow field in large-scale pumping station. The Yonghu pumping station, a large-scale pumping station, which was located in Guangdong Province, was taken as the research object. The numerical simulation and the site test were performed in order to investigate the effects of combined diversion piers on rectifying intake flow pattern in fore-bay and sump. A new type of combined diversion pier composed of double-I type, three-I type and cross vortex baffle were proposed. The flow pattern, the vorticity and the uniformity of axial velocity distribution were compared between the original design and the optimized design. The numerical simulation results showed that the new type of combined diversion pier could effectively improve the intake flow field of the pumping station. For the original design, 2 large-size circulations in the fore-bay and submerged vortices in the sump were observed. The size and strength of vortices increased with the increase of the water depth. Furthermore, spiral vortices existed in the 2 sides of the sump. However, for the optimized design, the double-I type diversion piers in front reduced divergent angle of the fore-bay, and decreased the size and strength of surface vortex. The three-I type piers adjusted the uniformity of flow field, and water flow was well introduced to the corresponding pump sump. Submerged vortices originating from bottom wall were almost completely eliminated by the cross vortex baffle. Flow pattern was uniform and smooth in the inlet of pumps, and the streamlines of axial section of pumps were good, without vortices. The uniformity of axial velocity distribution of pump inlet section was as high as 91.42%, and the axial velocity angle approached 86.01°. Compared to the original design, the uniformity of axial velocity distribution of bell-mouth inlet and pump inlet section for the optimized design was raised by 7.8%and 10.6%respectively. The results of site test showed that the size and the strength of circulations and vortices were decreased observably. The peak-to-peak value of pressure fluctuation at the top of pump volute casing fell from 8.07 to 6.69 m, with a decrease of 17.1%. The vibration velocity RMS (root mean square) values of pumps before optimization almost were completely greater than 2.8 mm/s, namely the vibration level was at level D which was specified in the national standard methods of measuring and evaluating vibration of pumps, and in that level pumps could not normally work. After the combined diversion piers were installed, the vibration velocity RMS values of pumps were less than or equal to 2.8 mm/s, in other words, the vibration level was at level C, and the pumping station could operate normally. By numerical simulation and site test, it can be concluded that the combined diversion piers have many positive effects in rectifying intake flow field of large-scale pumping station. The research results provide a beneficial reference for hydraulic design of this kind of large-scale pumping station.