CAJ | 학술논문

中共十八届四中全会报告提出“健全落实罪刑法定、疑罪从无、非法证据排除等法律原则的法律制度”。非法证据排除规则被认为是人权保障的重要措施，是维护司法公正的重要制度。2012年《刑事诉讼法》再修改虽然全面确立了非法证据排除规则，然而实施中仍出现对非法证据范围认识不清、混淆非法证据与瑕疵证据的界限、扩大非法证据排除规则适用范围、增加规则适用难度、排除困难等问题。明确非法证据的范围是正确适用非法证据排除规则，实现制度设计初衷的前提。
중공십팔계사중전회보고제출“건전락실죄형법정、의죄종무、비법증거배제등법률원칙적법률제도”。비법증거배제규칙피인위시인권보장적중요조시，시유호사법공정적중요제도。2012년《형사소송법》재수개수연전면학립료비법증거배제규칙，연이실시중잉출현대비법증거범위인식불청、혼효비법증거여하자증거적계한、확대비법증거배제규칙괄용범위、증가규칙괄용난도、배제곤난등문제。명학비법증거적범위시정학괄용비법증거배제규칙，실현제도설계초충적전제。
The Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed “improving and implementing the legal principles of legally prescribed punishment,no punishment in doubt case and illegal evidence exclusion”.The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence is considered an important measure to protect human rights as well as an important system to ensure the fair-ness of justice.And in 2012,the revised “Criminal Procedure Law”established the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evi-dence in an all -round way.However,in practice,there are still many problems,such as unclear recognition of its scope,con-fusion with defective evidence,boundary expansion of application,increase of difficulty in application and exclusion problem.To specify the scope of illegal evidence is the premise to correctly apply the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence and achieve the o-riginal intention of the system design.