临床口腔医学杂志
臨床口腔醫學雜誌
림상구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL STOMATOLOGY
2015年
8期
486-487,488
,共3页
无托槽隐形矫治器%固定矫治器%牙周指数
無託槽隱形矯治器%固定矯治器%牙週指數
무탁조은형교치기%고정교치기%아주지수
invisalign%fixed appliance%Periodontal indices
目的:观察无托槽隐形矫治器与固定矫正器矫治前、中、后期的牙周健康状况。方法:选取46例口腔正畸治疗患者,随机分成两组,A组26例为无托槽隐形矫治组,B组20例为直丝弓固定矫治组,分别检测患者矫治前、矫治过程中第1、3、6月,矫治完成时、矫治完成后3月的牙周指数(PLI、GBI、PD),比较两组牙周指数的变化。结果:与矫治前相比,A、B两组在矫治过程中的各项牙周指数均升高,而B组则升高明显(P<0.05)。 A组PLI、GBI在矫治过程中及矫治完成时均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组PD在矫治1月、3月时低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在矫治6月与结束时两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在矫治完成3月后,两组牙周指数均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:无托槽隐形矫治器比固定矫治器更有利于牙周组织健康维护。
目的:觀察無託槽隱形矯治器與固定矯正器矯治前、中、後期的牙週健康狀況。方法:選取46例口腔正畸治療患者,隨機分成兩組,A組26例為無託槽隱形矯治組,B組20例為直絲弓固定矯治組,分彆檢測患者矯治前、矯治過程中第1、3、6月,矯治完成時、矯治完成後3月的牙週指數(PLI、GBI、PD),比較兩組牙週指數的變化。結果:與矯治前相比,A、B兩組在矯治過程中的各項牙週指數均升高,而B組則升高明顯(P<0.05)。 A組PLI、GBI在矯治過程中及矯治完成時均低于B組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),A組PD在矯治1月、3月時低于B組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),在矯治6月與結束時兩組比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),在矯治完成3月後,兩組牙週指數均無明顯差異(P>0.05)。結論:無託槽隱形矯治器比固定矯治器更有利于牙週組織健康維護。
목적:관찰무탁조은형교치기여고정교정기교치전、중、후기적아주건강상황。방법:선취46례구강정기치료환자,수궤분성량조,A조26례위무탁조은형교치조,B조20례위직사궁고정교치조,분별검측환자교치전、교치과정중제1、3、6월,교치완성시、교치완성후3월적아주지수(PLI、GBI、PD),비교량조아주지수적변화。결과:여교치전상비,A、B량조재교치과정중적각항아주지수균승고,이B조칙승고명현(P<0.05)。 A조PLI、GBI재교치과정중급교치완성시균저우B조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),A조PD재교치1월、3월시저우B조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),재교치6월여결속시량조비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),재교치완성3월후,량조아주지수균무명현차이(P>0.05)。결론:무탁조은형교치기비고정교치기경유리우아주조직건강유호。
Objective:To evaluate the periodontal health between patients treated with invisalign? and fixed or-thodontic appliances. Method:46 cases were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups:26 patients in group A wore in-visalign? aligners while 20 patients in group B wore fixed orthodontic straight wire appliances.The periodontal indices in-cluding plaque index(PLI),gingival bleeding index(GBI),and probing depth(PD) were examined in both groups immedi-ately after the placement of fixed appliances (pretreatment),at 1,3,and 6 months after appliances were placed,after the appliance were removed,and 3 months after appliances were removed(posttreatment). Result:When compared with pretreat-ment,the periodontal indices of both groups during treatment were increased,while group B has significant increase (P <0.05). PLI、GBI of group A in the treatment period and completed treatment were lower than those in group B(P<0.05),PD in the group A was lower than the B group in the treatment of 1 months,3 months,but there was no significant difference in the treatment of 6 months and finished (P>0.05). While there was no significant difference between the two groups of peri-odontal indices in 3 months after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion:The invisalign? aligner is more propitious to periodontal health than the fixed appliances.