安徽医药
安徽醫藥
안휘의약
ANHUI MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
2015年
9期
1714-1717
,共4页
王全帮%季鹏%杨艳%袁晓毅%汪欣
王全幫%季鵬%楊豔%袁曉毅%汪訢
왕전방%계붕%양염%원효의%왕흔
磁共振胰胆管成像%胆总管结石%直径%检出率%对比研究
磁共振胰膽管成像%膽總管結石%直徑%檢齣率%對比研究
자공진이담관성상%담총관결석%직경%검출솔%대비연구
MRCP%choledocholithiasis%diameters%detection rate%comparative study
目的:评价磁共振胰胆管成像( MRCP)综合检查技术诊断胆总管结石的价值。方法搜集胆总管结石患者56例,调取其磁共振、CT及B超检查报告及图片,统计三者检出率,利用卡方检验统计分析差异性;统计三者检出、未检出结石直径数据,综合比较三种检查方法的优劣并分析原因。结果 MRCP综合组,CT组,B超组诊断胆总管结石检出率分别为98.2%、77.1%、46.5%,卡方检验显示三者检出率差异有统计学意义。 MRCP综合组、CT组及B超组检出结石直径分别为(1.17±0.68)、(1.37±0.60)、(1.38±0.63)cm,方差分析显示三者差异没有统计学意义。结论 MRCP综合检查技术诊断胆总管结石检出率显著优于B超及CT,但检出小结石能力三者无差异性。
目的:評價磁共振胰膽管成像( MRCP)綜閤檢查技術診斷膽總管結石的價值。方法搜集膽總管結石患者56例,調取其磁共振、CT及B超檢查報告及圖片,統計三者檢齣率,利用卡方檢驗統計分析差異性;統計三者檢齣、未檢齣結石直徑數據,綜閤比較三種檢查方法的優劣併分析原因。結果 MRCP綜閤組,CT組,B超組診斷膽總管結石檢齣率分彆為98.2%、77.1%、46.5%,卡方檢驗顯示三者檢齣率差異有統計學意義。 MRCP綜閤組、CT組及B超組檢齣結石直徑分彆為(1.17±0.68)、(1.37±0.60)、(1.38±0.63)cm,方差分析顯示三者差異沒有統計學意義。結論 MRCP綜閤檢查技術診斷膽總管結石檢齣率顯著優于B超及CT,但檢齣小結石能力三者無差異性。
목적:평개자공진이담관성상( MRCP)종합검사기술진단담총관결석적개치。방법수집담총관결석환자56례,조취기자공진、CT급B초검사보고급도편,통계삼자검출솔,이용잡방검험통계분석차이성;통계삼자검출、미검출결석직경수거,종합비교삼충검사방법적우렬병분석원인。결과 MRCP종합조,CT조,B초조진단담총관결석검출솔분별위98.2%、77.1%、46.5%,잡방검험현시삼자검출솔차이유통계학의의。 MRCP종합조、CT조급B초조검출결석직경분별위(1.17±0.68)、(1.37±0.60)、(1.38±0.63)cm,방차분석현시삼자차이몰유통계학의의。결론 MRCP종합검사기술진단담총관결석검출솔현저우우B초급CT,단검출소결석능력삼자무차이성。
Objective To evaluate the value of MRCP combined with MRI comprehensive diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Methods We collected the MR,CT and ultrasound reports and imagings of 56 patients with choledocholithiasis,and figured out the respective de-tection rates with MR,CT and ultrasonography and analyzed their differences by using Chi-square test.Besides,the data of the stone di-ameters detected and undetected by MR,CT and ultrasonography were summarized and advantages as well as disadvantages of the three test methods were analyzed.Results The detection rates of MRCP combined with MRI diagnosis of choledocholithiasis,CT and ul-trosonography were 98.2%,77.1%,and 46.5%,respectively.By comparing three sets of data,the results of Chi-square test detection showed that the difference in detection rate was statistically significant.The stone diameters detected by MRCP combined with MRI,CT and ultrasonography were (1.17 ±0.68),(1.37 ±0.60) cm,and (1.38 ±0.63) cm,respectively.Variance analysis results showed that there was no significant difference.Conclusions The detection rate of MRCP combined with MRI diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is significantly higher than that of ultrasonography and CT detection.But there is no difference in the ability to detect microlith.