海南师范大学学报(社会科学版)
海南師範大學學報(社會科學版)
해남사범대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF HAINAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2015年
8期
31-37
,共7页
《说倭传》%抗战文学%甲午中日海战%现代民族国家
《說倭傳》%抗戰文學%甲午中日海戰%現代民族國傢
《설왜전》%항전문학%갑오중일해전%현대민족국가
A Biography of Japanese%Anti-Japanese War literature%the Sino-Japanese naval battle of 1894-1895%modern national state
甲午中日海战中国战败之后,在中国文学界涌现出了一批以抗日为主题的文学作品,这些作品可以看作是中国抗战小说的源头。《说倭传》作为第一部从全局角度表现中日甲午战争的文学作品,更是具有重要的史料价值,尤其是其后全文附上的《中日议和纪略》和几乎事无巨细记录下来的李鸿章与伊藤博文的会谈过程更为我们揭示了两种国家观念之间的冲突。通过对《说倭传》等史料和文学作品的分析,不难发现,将中国抗战文学的源头追溯到甲午中日海战中国失利是有其重要意义的。它大大拓宽了抗战文学的疆域,将抗战文学置于更广阔的空间内,还原了抗战文学长期被遮蔽在误解下的重要意义和价值。
甲午中日海戰中國戰敗之後,在中國文學界湧現齣瞭一批以抗日為主題的文學作品,這些作品可以看作是中國抗戰小說的源頭。《說倭傳》作為第一部從全跼角度錶現中日甲午戰爭的文學作品,更是具有重要的史料價值,尤其是其後全文附上的《中日議和紀略》和幾乎事無巨細記錄下來的李鴻章與伊籐博文的會談過程更為我們揭示瞭兩種國傢觀唸之間的遲突。通過對《說倭傳》等史料和文學作品的分析,不難髮現,將中國抗戰文學的源頭追溯到甲午中日海戰中國失利是有其重要意義的。它大大拓寬瞭抗戰文學的疆域,將抗戰文學置于更廣闊的空間內,還原瞭抗戰文學長期被遮蔽在誤解下的重要意義和價值。
갑오중일해전중국전패지후,재중국문학계용현출료일비이항일위주제적문학작품,저사작품가이간작시중국항전소설적원두。《설왜전》작위제일부종전국각도표현중일갑오전쟁적문학작품,경시구유중요적사료개치,우기시기후전문부상적《중일의화기략》화궤호사무거세기록하래적리홍장여이등박문적회담과정경위아문게시료량충국가관념지간적충돌。통과대《설왜전》등사료화문학작품적분석,불난발현,장중국항전문학적원두추소도갑오중일해전중국실리시유기중요의의적。타대대탁관료항전문학적강역,장항전문학치우경엄활적공간내,환원료항전문학장기피차폐재오해하적중요의의화개치。
After China’s defeat in the Sino-Japanese naval battle of 1894-1895, there emerged in the Chi-nese literary circle a host of Anti-Japanese literary works which can be considered the source of novels on the Anti-Japanese War. As the first literary works to give a panorama of the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, A Biography of Japanese is of greater significance in the value of historical data, as is evident in the subsequently attached full text of A Brief History of China-Japan Peace Negotiations and the minutely-recorded talks between Li Hongzhang and Ito Hirobumi—a distinct revelation of the conflict between China and Japan in their respective state concept. Through an analysis of A Biography of Japanese and relevant historical data and literary works, it is highly signifi-cant, as is easily found, to date the source of Chinese Anti-Japanese War literature back to China’ s defeat in the Sino-Japanese naval battle of 1894-1895, for it has greatly broadened the domain of Anti-Japanese War literature, thus having placed it in a more extensive space and restored its long-shrouded and misunderstood significance and value.