中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2015年
22期
37-37,40
,共2页
药物流产%手术流产%妊娠
藥物流產%手術流產%妊娠
약물유산%수술유산%임신
Medical abortion%Surgical abortion%Pregnancy
目的：比较药物流产和手术流产对再次妊娠的影响，为医院选择合适的流产方式提供科学依据。方法选择药物流产史的108例健康妇女和手术流产史的108例健康妇女，分别设为药物流产组和手术流产组，观察两组妊娠期的先兆流产、早产、胎盘前置和产后出血等并发症，并进行比较分析。结果手术流产组再次妊娠的先兆流产、胎盘粘连、胎盘前置及产后出血率较药物流产组高，有显著差异(P<0.01)，药物流产组较手术流产组产后出血率低（P<0.05）。结论药物流产对再次妊娠的不良影响较手术流产低得多，因此意外妊娠可首选药物流产。
目的：比較藥物流產和手術流產對再次妊娠的影響，為醫院選擇閤適的流產方式提供科學依據。方法選擇藥物流產史的108例健康婦女和手術流產史的108例健康婦女，分彆設為藥物流產組和手術流產組，觀察兩組妊娠期的先兆流產、早產、胎盤前置和產後齣血等併髮癥，併進行比較分析。結果手術流產組再次妊娠的先兆流產、胎盤粘連、胎盤前置及產後齣血率較藥物流產組高，有顯著差異(P<0.01)，藥物流產組較手術流產組產後齣血率低（P<0.05）。結論藥物流產對再次妊娠的不良影響較手術流產低得多，因此意外妊娠可首選藥物流產。
목적：비교약물유산화수술유산대재차임신적영향，위의원선택합괄적유산방식제공과학의거。방법선택약물유산사적108례건강부녀화수술유산사적108례건강부녀，분별설위약물유산조화수술유산조，관찰량조임신기적선조유산、조산、태반전치화산후출혈등병발증，병진행비교분석。결과수술유산조재차임신적선조유산、태반점련、태반전치급산후출혈솔교약물유산조고，유현저차이(P<0.01)，약물유산조교수술유산조산후출혈솔저（P<0.05）。결론약물유산대재차임신적불량영향교수술유산저득다，인차의외임신가수선약물유산。
Objective To compare the medical abortion and surgical abortion impact on subsequent pregnancy, the hospital provides a scientiifc basis for selecting the appropriate abortion method. Methods 108 cases of abortion history of drug 108 cases of healthy women and women's health history surgical abortion, medical abortion groups were set and surgical abortion groups were observed during pregnancy threatened abortion, premature birth, placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage complications, and comparative analysis. Results The surgical abortion group again threatened abortion pregnancy, placenta accreta, placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage rate higher medical abortion group, a signiifcant difference (P<0.01), medical abortion group compared with the low rate of postpartum hemorrhage surgical abortion group (P<0.05). Conclusion Adverse effects of abortion on subsequent pregnancy is much lower than the surgical abortion, unwanted pregnancy and therefore abortion can be the drug of choice.
