交通运输研究
交通運輸研究
교통운수연구
Transportation Standardization
2015年
4期
22-29
,共8页
朱宏%谢云侠%张汝华%姜洋
硃宏%謝雲俠%張汝華%薑洋
주굉%사운협%장여화%강양
公共交通%BRT站点%聚类分析%步行吸引距离%正态分布%因子分析
公共交通%BRT站點%聚類分析%步行吸引距離%正態分佈%因子分析
공공교통%BRT참점%취류분석%보행흡인거리%정태분포%인자분석
public transport%BRT station%cluster analysis%walking attractive distance%normal dis-tribution%factor analysis
针对目前对BRT站点简单的分类及步行吸引距离的粗泛定义，以济南市1~3号快速公交作为研究背景，开展了关于快速公交站点分类方法及各类站点对步行吸引范围的研究。以在19个快速公交站点中进行的RP(Revealed Preference Survey)调查及济南ArcGIS数据库为数据基础，选取了9个站点步行吸引距离的影响因素，借助聚类分析法并利用Matlab工具箱拟合正态分布模型，最终总结归纳出5类快速公交站点，并计算得到各类型站点的步行吸引距离。结果表明：终端型站点的步行吸引距离最长，为1300m；其次是交通枢纽型站点，为1100m；城市次中心型与城市中心型站点步行吸引距离相差不多，平均为750m；一般型站点步行吸引距离最短，约为630m。不同类型站点的步行吸引距离相差较大，不能以单一经验值解释所有BRT站点，其中城市次中心型与城市中心型站点步行吸引距离适中，是理想的站点类型。
針對目前對BRT站點簡單的分類及步行吸引距離的粗汎定義，以濟南市1~3號快速公交作為研究揹景，開展瞭關于快速公交站點分類方法及各類站點對步行吸引範圍的研究。以在19箇快速公交站點中進行的RP(Revealed Preference Survey)調查及濟南ArcGIS數據庫為數據基礎，選取瞭9箇站點步行吸引距離的影響因素，藉助聚類分析法併利用Matlab工具箱擬閤正態分佈模型，最終總結歸納齣5類快速公交站點，併計算得到各類型站點的步行吸引距離。結果錶明：終耑型站點的步行吸引距離最長，為1300m；其次是交通樞紐型站點，為1100m；城市次中心型與城市中心型站點步行吸引距離相差不多，平均為750m；一般型站點步行吸引距離最短，約為630m。不同類型站點的步行吸引距離相差較大，不能以單一經驗值解釋所有BRT站點，其中城市次中心型與城市中心型站點步行吸引距離適中，是理想的站點類型。
침대목전대BRT참점간단적분류급보행흡인거리적조범정의，이제남시1~3호쾌속공교작위연구배경，개전료관우쾌속공교참점분류방법급각류참점대보행흡인범위적연구。이재19개쾌속공교참점중진행적RP(Revealed Preference Survey)조사급제남ArcGIS수거고위수거기출，선취료9개참점보행흡인거리적영향인소，차조취류분석법병이용Matlab공구상의합정태분포모형，최종총결귀납출5류쾌속공교참점，병계산득도각류형참점적보행흡인거리。결과표명：종단형참점적보행흡인거리최장，위1300m；기차시교통추뉴형참점，위1100m；성시차중심형여성시중심형참점보행흡인거리상차불다，평균위750m；일반형참점보행흡인거리최단，약위630m。불동류형참점적보행흡인거리상차교대，불능이단일경험치해석소유BRT참점，기중성시차중심형여성시중심형참점보행흡인거리괄중，시이상적참점류형。
Aiming at the simple classification and the rough definition on walking attractive distance of BRT stations, Jinan BRT Line 1 to Line 3 were selected as the research background to make an explora?tion on the types of BRT stations and their walking attractive distances. 9 influencing factors were ex?tracted basing on the RP Survey of 19 stations and Jinan ArcGIS database. By the use of cluster analysis method and Matlab toolbox, 5 kinds of BRT stations were summarized and their walking attractive dis?tances were calculated. The result shows that the attractive distance of walking to the terminal stations is the longest, more than 1 300 meters, followed by that of walking to the transport hub stations with a value of 1 100 meters;the attractive distance of walking to the urban sub-center stations is similar with that of the urban center stations, with an average of 750 meters;for general stations, the attractive distance of walking is the shortest, only about 630 meters. Obviously, there are great differences among walking at?tracting distances of different types of stations and a single experience value could not explain all the types. The urban sub-center stations and urban center stations with moderate values are the ideal types.
