CAJ | 학술논문

实验手段对实现应用性本科教学目标起到较为基础的建设性作用。模拟实验与虚拟实验是实验教学的两种主要方式。运用不同背景的本科实验教学实践的相关数据，对分别参与模拟实验和虚拟实验的本科生的教学效果进行了对比式实证分析。实证结果表明：模拟实验的效果总体上优于虚拟实验；实验成本与教学效果无关；师资水平与实验效果显著正相关；实验成本与师资水平显著负相关。此外，两种实验方式对学生职业倾向的影响也有显著的差异。以这些实证结论为依据，提出了实施模拟实验教学的若干建议。
실험수단대실현응용성본과교학목표기도교위기출적건설성작용。모의실험여허의실험시실험교학적량충주요방식。운용불동배경적본과실험교학실천적상관수거，대분별삼여모의실험화허의실험적본과생적교학효과진행료대비식실증분석。실증결과표명：모의실험적효과총체상우우허의실험；실험성본여교학효과무관；사자수평여실험효과현저정상관；실험성본여사자수평현저부상관。차외，량충실험방식대학생직업경향적영향야유현저적차이。이저사실증결론위의거，제출료실시모의실험교학적약간건의。
Experiments play a basic constructive role to achieve goals of application undergraduate teaching. Simulation experiments and virtual experiments are two main means for experimental teaching. We made empirical analysis and comparison formula for teaching effectiveness between students who involved in simulation and virtual experiments. The results showed that, the overall effects of simulation experiments were better than that of virtual experiment;teaching effectiveness did nothing with the cost of experiments; teacher level had significant positive correlation with experimental results; the cost of experiments had significant negative correlation with teacher level. Moreover, two experimental means made significant differences on students' professional tendency. We brought out a number of recommendations to implement simulation teaching based on these empirical results.