食品安全质量检测学报
食品安全質量檢測學報
식품안전질량검측학보
FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY DETECTION TECHNOLOGY
2015年
8期
3108-3113
,共6页
角鲨烯%高效液相色谱法%保健食品
角鯊烯%高效液相色譜法%保健食品
각사희%고효액상색보법%보건식품
squalene%high performance liquid chromatography%health food
目的:建立高效液相色谱法测定角鲨烯软胶囊中角鲨烯的含量。方法样品经甲醇提取,以甲醇/乙腈(V:V=60:40)为流动相,流速为1.2 mL/min,经高效液相色谱在色谱柱Waters Spherisorb C18分离,柱温为40℃;然后在检测波长为203 nm的条件下测定角鲨烯的含量。结果角鲨烯的浓度在0.1023~0.5118 mg/mL的范围内与峰面积线性关系良好,相关系数r>0.999,方法的检出限为0.0025%,在不同添加水平下,方法的平均回收率为100.5%,相对标准偏差为0.6%(n=9)。与我国《国家药品标准》中WS-1001-(HD-080-18)-2002角鲨烯气相色谱法测定比较,两种结果无显著差异。结论高效液相色谱法更快捷简单,节省检测成本,可应用于保健食品中角鲨烯的含量测定。
目的:建立高效液相色譜法測定角鯊烯軟膠囊中角鯊烯的含量。方法樣品經甲醇提取,以甲醇/乙腈(V:V=60:40)為流動相,流速為1.2 mL/min,經高效液相色譜在色譜柱Waters Spherisorb C18分離,柱溫為40℃;然後在檢測波長為203 nm的條件下測定角鯊烯的含量。結果角鯊烯的濃度在0.1023~0.5118 mg/mL的範圍內與峰麵積線性關繫良好,相關繫數r>0.999,方法的檢齣限為0.0025%,在不同添加水平下,方法的平均迴收率為100.5%,相對標準偏差為0.6%(n=9)。與我國《國傢藥品標準》中WS-1001-(HD-080-18)-2002角鯊烯氣相色譜法測定比較,兩種結果無顯著差異。結論高效液相色譜法更快捷簡單,節省檢測成本,可應用于保健食品中角鯊烯的含量測定。
목적:건립고효액상색보법측정각사희연효낭중각사희적함량。방법양품경갑순제취,이갑순/을정(V:V=60:40)위류동상,류속위1.2 mL/min,경고효액상색보재색보주Waters Spherisorb C18분리,주온위40℃;연후재검측파장위203 nm적조건하측정각사희적함량。결과각사희적농도재0.1023~0.5118 mg/mL적범위내여봉면적선성관계량호,상관계수r>0.999,방법적검출한위0.0025%,재불동첨가수평하,방법적평균회수솔위100.5%,상대표준편차위0.6%(n=9)。여아국《국가약품표준》중WS-1001-(HD-080-18)-2002각사희기상색보법측정비교,량충결과무현저차이。결론고효액상색보법경쾌첩간단,절성검측성본,가응용우보건식품중각사희적함량측정。
Objective To establish a method for the determination of squalene in squalene soft capsules by high performance liquid chromatography. Methods Samples were extracted with methanol, and being separated by waters spherisorb C18 column with the mobile phase of methanol/acetonitrile (V:V=60:40), and the flow rate was 1.2 mL/min, the column temperature was 40 ℃, the content of squalene were determined by HPLC under the detection wavelength at 203 nm. Results The method showed a good linearity in the range of 0.1023~0.5118 mg/mL for squalene with the coefficient r>0.999, the detection limit was 0.0025%, the average recovery of different adding levels was 100.5%, and the relative standard deviation was 0.6%(n=9). Compared with the WS-1001-(HD-080-18)-2002 squalene gas chromatography method of National Drug Standards, there was no statistical difference between the two results. Conclusion HPLC method is more quick and easy, saving testing cost, and applicable to measure the content of squalene in health foods.