兰州大学学报(社会科学版)
蘭州大學學報(社會科學版)
란주대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF LANZHOU UNIVERSITY (SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2015年
4期
160-166
,共7页
洛克%政治哲学%教育思想%自然权利%自由
洛剋%政治哲學%教育思想%自然權利%自由
락극%정치철학%교육사상%자연권리%자유
John Locke%political philosophy%educational thought%natural right%freedom
教育思想是洛克政治哲学的重要组成部分。自由主义哲学家与教育思想家的双重身份使洛克的思想貌似充满矛盾和两面性:作为政治哲学家,洛克否定了政治社会具有教育功能,作为教育思想家,洛克又将培育政治社会理想公民的重任寄托于家庭教育;在政治哲学中,洛克力图将政治权利从“家长制”中解脱出来,而在谈论教育时他又坚持将“家长权威”赋予父母。否定政治社会的教育功能并不意味着教育对政治社会毫无意义,恰恰相反,教育功能必须通过家庭来进行弥补,只有这样民主社会的设计才是完整的。要正确理解洛克的教育思想就必须将其放入民主社会设计的整体理论视野当中,也正是在政治与教育、政治社会与家庭、权利与德性、自由与权威等种种复杂张力的背后,隐藏着洛克对于化解自由民主社会危机的良苦用心。
教育思想是洛剋政治哲學的重要組成部分。自由主義哲學傢與教育思想傢的雙重身份使洛剋的思想貌似充滿矛盾和兩麵性:作為政治哲學傢,洛剋否定瞭政治社會具有教育功能,作為教育思想傢,洛剋又將培育政治社會理想公民的重任寄託于傢庭教育;在政治哲學中,洛剋力圖將政治權利從“傢長製”中解脫齣來,而在談論教育時他又堅持將“傢長權威”賦予父母。否定政治社會的教育功能併不意味著教育對政治社會毫無意義,恰恰相反,教育功能必鬚通過傢庭來進行瀰補,隻有這樣民主社會的設計纔是完整的。要正確理解洛剋的教育思想就必鬚將其放入民主社會設計的整體理論視野噹中,也正是在政治與教育、政治社會與傢庭、權利與德性、自由與權威等種種複雜張力的揹後,隱藏著洛剋對于化解自由民主社會危機的良苦用心。
교육사상시락극정치철학적중요조성부분。자유주의철학가여교육사상가적쌍중신빈사락극적사상모사충만모순화량면성:작위정치철학가,락극부정료정치사회구유교육공능,작위교육사상가,락극우장배육정치사회이상공민적중임기탁우가정교육;재정치철학중,락극력도장정치권리종“가장제”중해탈출래,이재담론교육시타우견지장“가장권위”부여부모。부정정치사회적교육공능병불의미착교육대정치사회호무의의,흡흡상반,교육공능필수통과가정래진행미보,지유저양민주사회적설계재시완정적。요정학리해락극적교육사상취필수장기방입민주사회설계적정체이론시야당중,야정시재정치여교육、정치사회여가정、권리여덕성、자유여권위등충충복잡장력적배후,은장착락극대우화해자유민주사회위궤적량고용심。
Educational thought is an important component of Locke’s political philosophy. Locke’s dual identity of being a liberal philosopher as well as an educational thinker makes his ideas full of contradiction and duality:as a political philosopher, Locke denies the educational function of a political society;as an edu-cational thinker, Locke emphasizes the function of family education in the cultivation of an ideal social citi-zen. In his political philosophy, Locke advocates political rights free from“being patriarchal”; however, when it comes to education, he emphasizes that authority should be given to parents. To deny the educational function of a political society does not necessarily mean that education is meaningless to a political society;on the contrary, the educational function should be compensated by family education. Only in this way, can the plan for a democratic society be completed. To correctly understand Locke’s educational thought, a dem-ocratic social setting should be taken into consideration as one part of the whole theoretical scaffolding. It is in the tensions between politics and education, political society and family, power and morality, freedom and authority that we can see Locke’s deep concern for the crisis to be faced by democratic society.