岩矿测试
巖礦測試
암광측시
ROCK AND MINERAL ANALYSIS
2015年
4期
408-413
,共6页
汤志云%江冶%汪建明%张梅%乔爱香%肖灵%曹磊
湯誌雲%江冶%汪建明%張梅%喬愛香%肖靈%曹磊
탕지운%강야%왕건명%장매%교애향%초령%조뢰
硅孔雀石%透视石%稀土元素地球化学特征%成矿环境%电感耦合等离子体质谱法
硅孔雀石%透視石%稀土元素地毬化學特徵%成礦環境%電感耦閤等離子體質譜法
규공작석%투시석%희토원소지구화학특정%성광배경%전감우합등리자체질보법
chrysocolla%dioptase%geochemical characteristics of rare earth elements%metallogenetic environments%Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
硅孔雀石和透视石是在热液成矿作用下经过水-岩反应形成的产物,但这一认识缺少稀土地球化学研究成果的支持。本文通过电感耦合等离子体质谱分析获得两种矿物的稀土元素含量,其中硅孔雀石的稀土含量较低(∑REEs=81.2 mg/kg),透视石的稀土含量极低(∑REEs=0.65 mg/kg);两者轻重稀土间分馏较为显著,LREEs/HREEs=3.01和6.05,( La/Yb )H =3.08和7.91。球粒陨石标准化的稀土元素配分模式图均表现为轻微“负铕异常”(δEu=0.565和0.702)、轻稀土富集、重稀土稳定的右倾特征,表明两者物质来源于同一物体。硅孔雀石显著“负铈异常”(δCe=0.219),透视石无“负铈异常”(δCe=0.949),应为两者晶体结构差异所致。研究认为,硅孔雀石和透视石中的稀土元素继承了成矿岩石的稀土特征,证实了两者是在同一氧化条件下通过水-岩反应形成的产物。
硅孔雀石和透視石是在熱液成礦作用下經過水-巖反應形成的產物,但這一認識缺少稀土地毬化學研究成果的支持。本文通過電感耦閤等離子體質譜分析穫得兩種礦物的稀土元素含量,其中硅孔雀石的稀土含量較低(∑REEs=81.2 mg/kg),透視石的稀土含量極低(∑REEs=0.65 mg/kg);兩者輕重稀土間分餾較為顯著,LREEs/HREEs=3.01和6.05,( La/Yb )H =3.08和7.91。毬粒隕石標準化的稀土元素配分模式圖均錶現為輕微“負銪異常”(δEu=0.565和0.702)、輕稀土富集、重稀土穩定的右傾特徵,錶明兩者物質來源于同一物體。硅孔雀石顯著“負鈰異常”(δCe=0.219),透視石無“負鈰異常”(δCe=0.949),應為兩者晶體結構差異所緻。研究認為,硅孔雀石和透視石中的稀土元素繼承瞭成礦巖石的稀土特徵,證實瞭兩者是在同一氧化條件下通過水-巖反應形成的產物。
규공작석화투시석시재열액성광작용하경과수-암반응형성적산물,단저일인식결소희토지구화학연구성과적지지。본문통과전감우합등리자체질보분석획득량충광물적희토원소함량,기중규공작석적희토함량교저(∑REEs=81.2 mg/kg),투시석적희토함량겁저(∑REEs=0.65 mg/kg);량자경중희토간분류교위현저,LREEs/HREEs=3.01화6.05,( La/Yb )H =3.08화7.91。구립운석표준화적희토원소배분모식도균표현위경미“부유이상”(δEu=0.565화0.702)、경희토부집、중희토은정적우경특정,표명량자물질래원우동일물체。규공작석현저“부시이상”(δCe=0.219),투시석무“부시이상”(δCe=0.949),응위량자정체결구차이소치。연구인위,규공작석화투시석중적희토원소계승료성광암석적희토특정,증실료량자시재동일양화조건하통과수-암반응형성적산물。
Chrysocolla and dioptase were considered to be formed from hydrothermal solutions by fluid-rock interaction,but this view was not verified by REE geochemistry. In this study,the REEs contents in these two minerals were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry ( ICP-MS ). Results show that chrysocolla has total REEs of 81 mg/kg,whereas dioptase has total REEs of 0. 65 mg/kg. There is obvious fractionation of LREEs from HREEs for chrysocolla and dioptase with LREEs/HREEs ratios of 3 . 01 and 6 . 05 ,and (La/Yb)H ratios of 3. 08 and 7. 91,respectively. The chondrite-normalized REEs patterns of two minerals show weak Eu anomalies with δEu of 0. 565 and 0. 702,respectively,with LREEs enrichment and flat HREEs, indicating their similar source. Obvious Ce anomaly(δCe =0. 219)of chrysocolla and no Ce anomaly(δCe =0. 949)of dioptase are possibly due to their different crystal structures. Chrysocolla and dioptase inherit the REEs characteristics of the source rocks. These two minerals were formed by fluid-rock interaction under the same oxidized condition.