CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解老年科不同岗位护士应用跌倒危险因素评估表的现状。方法采用现场调查方法，对86名老年科不同岗位护士应用跌倒危险因素评估表的现状进行调查。结果89．5％老年科护士能及时评估跌倒危险因素，80．2％护士能准确评估跌倒危险因素，62．8％护士能针对性制订防跌倒护嘱。初级责任护士在跌倒危险因素评估的准确性方面较高级责任护士低，差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05），而在评估及时性和制订护嘱针对性方面比较，差异无统计学意义（均P＞0．05）。结论加强应用跌倒危险因素评估表使用方法的培训，使评估表真正发挥其诊断价值，以保障患者的安全及降低患者院内跌倒发生率。
목적：료해노년과불동강위호사응용질도위험인소평고표적현상。방법채용현장조사방법，대86명노년과불동강위호사응용질도위험인소평고표적현상진행조사。결과89．5％노년과호사능급시평고질도위험인소，80．2％호사능준학평고질도위험인소，62．8％호사능침대성제정방질도호촉。초급책임호사재질도위험인소평고적준학성방면교고급책임호사저，차이유통계학의의（P＜0．05），이재평고급시성화제정호촉침대성방면비교，차이무통계학의의（균P＞0．05）。결론가강응용질도위험인소평고표사용방법적배훈，사평고표진정발휘기진단개치，이보장환자적안전급강저환자원내질도발생솔。
Objective To investigate the status quo of application of fall risk factors assessment scale in nurses of different position in geriatric ward . Method Eighty-six nurses in different position were investigated by fall risk factors assessment scale . Results About 89 . 5%of the nurses could assess the fall risk factors on time and 80 . 2%could do it accurately , and only 62 . 8%of them worked out their nursing orders based on the possible falls. In terms of the accuracy in using fall risk factors assessment, the primary nurses was poorer than the senior nurses, with statistically significant difference between them (P<0.05). Yet there were no significant differences between them in timeliness and pertinence at working out nursing orders (P>0.05). Conclusion We should strengthen the training to the clinical nurses in correctly using the fall assessment scale , in order to exert the diagnostic value of the fall assessment scale, reduce the incidence of falls and ensure the safety of the patients.