中国护理管理
中國護理管理
중국호리관리
CHINESE NURSING MANAGEMENT
2015年
7期
773-777
,共5页
床位使用率%养老机构
床位使用率%養老機構
상위사용솔%양로궤구
rate of bed occupancy%long-term care facilities
目的:调查北京市养老机构床位使用率现状,比较公办与民办养老机构的床位使用率差异,为养老机构运营管理、政府制定相关政策提供依据.方法:采用自设问卷,对北京市362家养老机构进行横断面调查.结果:养老机构床位使用率为49.67(22.11,78.33)%.床均职工数、床均护理员数、床均经认证机构培训的护理员数、投保床位率、收住社会老人所占比例、是否与就近医疗机构签订医疗保障协议以及医疗保障是否纳入医保定点对养老机构床位使用率的影响有统计学意义.经过协方差处理,公办与民办养老机构相对床位使用率差异无统计学意义.结论:北京市养老机构床位使用率较低,公办与民办养老机构床位使用率无差别,机构及相关部门可从机构人力配置、床位投保、医疗保障、收住社会老人所占比例等多方面综合考虑以提高床位使用率.
目的:調查北京市養老機構床位使用率現狀,比較公辦與民辦養老機構的床位使用率差異,為養老機構運營管理、政府製定相關政策提供依據.方法:採用自設問捲,對北京市362傢養老機構進行橫斷麵調查.結果:養老機構床位使用率為49.67(22.11,78.33)%.床均職工數、床均護理員數、床均經認證機構培訓的護理員數、投保床位率、收住社會老人所佔比例、是否與就近醫療機構籤訂醫療保障協議以及醫療保障是否納入醫保定點對養老機構床位使用率的影響有統計學意義.經過協方差處理,公辦與民辦養老機構相對床位使用率差異無統計學意義.結論:北京市養老機構床位使用率較低,公辦與民辦養老機構床位使用率無差彆,機構及相關部門可從機構人力配置、床位投保、醫療保障、收住社會老人所佔比例等多方麵綜閤攷慮以提高床位使用率.
목적:조사북경시양로궤구상위사용솔현상,비교공판여민판양로궤구적상위사용솔차이,위양로궤구운영관리、정부제정상관정책제공의거.방법:채용자설문권,대북경시362가양로궤구진행횡단면조사.결과:양로궤구상위사용솔위49.67(22.11,78.33)%.상균직공수、상균호리원수、상균경인증궤구배훈적호리원수、투보상위솔、수주사회노인소점비례、시부여취근의료궤구첨정의료보장협의이급의료보장시부납입의보정점대양로궤구상위사용솔적영향유통계학의의.경과협방차처리,공판여민판양로궤구상대상위사용솔차이무통계학의의.결론:북경시양로궤구상위사용솔교저,공판여민판양로궤구상위사용솔무차별,궤구급상관부문가종궤구인력배치、상위투보、의료보장、수주사회노인소점비례등다방면종합고필이제고상위사용솔.
Objective: To understand the current status of the bed occupancy rate of long-term care facilities in Beijing and explore its influencing factors. Then, comparing the bed occupancy rate between public facilities and private facilities so as to provide evidence for the management of facilities and policy-making of government. Method: This study investigated 362 long-term care facilities by using self-made questionnaire. Result: The median rate of bed occupancy was 49.67 (22.11, 78.33) %. The multiple regression analysis showed that the rate of bed occupancy would be inlfuenced by per bed number of staffs, per bed number of nursing attendants, per bed number of certiifed nursing attendants, rate of insured bed, percentage of public residents, medical service contract with nearby health facilities, medical service covered by insurance. The covariance analysis showed that the bed occupancy rate difference between public facilities and private facilities was no statistic meaning. Conclusion: The bed occupancy of long-term care facilities in Beijing was on a low level. The bed occupancy rates were no difference between public long-term care facilities and private facilities. Facilities and government should consider manpower allocation, bed insurance, medical service and the percentage of public residents synthetically to improve the rate of bed occupancy.
