中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
18期
64-65
,共2页
动力髋螺钉组%股骨近端髓内钉组%股骨粗隆间骨折
動力髖螺釘組%股骨近耑髓內釘組%股骨粗隆間骨摺
동력관라정조%고골근단수내정조%고골조륭간골절
DHS group%Proximal femoral nail group%Intertrochanteric fracture
目的 探究与分析不同手术方法治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效及预后.方法选取我院自2013年2月~ 2014年2月収治的股骨粗隆间骨折70例,采取随机数字表法分为动力髋螺钉组与股骨近端髓内钉组,每组各35例,对比两组患者的临床疗效及并发症发生率.结果动力髋螺钉组与股骨近端髓内钉优良率相比无明显差异(P>0.05),股骨近端髓内钉组的并发生发生率明显低于动力髋螺钉组(P<0.05).结论采用股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗空间骨折均可取得显著临床疗效,但前者并发生发生率较低,预后较好.
目的 探究與分析不同手術方法治療股骨粗隆間骨摺的臨床療效及預後.方法選取我院自2013年2月~ 2014年2月収治的股骨粗隆間骨摺70例,採取隨機數字錶法分為動力髖螺釘組與股骨近耑髓內釘組,每組各35例,對比兩組患者的臨床療效及併髮癥髮生率.結果動力髖螺釘組與股骨近耑髓內釘優良率相比無明顯差異(P>0.05),股骨近耑髓內釘組的併髮生髮生率明顯低于動力髖螺釘組(P<0.05).結論採用股骨近耑髓內釘與動力髖螺釘治療股骨粗空間骨摺均可取得顯著臨床療效,但前者併髮生髮生率較低,預後較好.
목적 탐구여분석불동수술방법치료고골조륭간골절적림상료효급예후.방법선취아원자2013년2월~ 2014년2월수치적고골조륭간골절70례,채취수궤수자표법분위동력관라정조여고골근단수내정조,매조각35례,대비량조환자적림상료효급병발증발생솔.결과동력관라정조여고골근단수내정우량솔상비무명현차이(P>0.05),고골근단수내정조적병발생발생솔명현저우동력관라정조(P<0.05).결론채용고골근단수내정여동력관라정치료고골조공간골절균가취득현저림상료효,단전자병발생발생솔교저,예후교호.
Objective To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy of different surgical Methods of treatment of intertrochanteric fractures and prognosis. Methods 70 cases of fracture in our hospital since intertrochanteric February 2013 to February 2014 admitted to taking randomly divided into groups with dynamic hip screw proximal femoral nail group, 35 cases in each group , compared two groups of patients with clinical efficacy and complication rates.Results DHS was no significant difference (P>0.05), proximal femoral nail group and occurred significantly lower compared with the incidence of proximal femoral nail excelent rate DHS group (P<0.05) .Conclusion The proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of femoral fractures coarse space can achieve significant clinical efficacy, but the former and lower incidence occurs, the prognosis is good, worthy of promotion and application.
