中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
18期
56-58
,共3页
脊柱胸腰段骨折%前路手术方式%后路手术方式%临床效果
脊柱胸腰段骨摺%前路手術方式%後路手術方式%臨床效果
척주흉요단골절%전로수술방식%후로수술방식%림상효과
Thoracic lumbar spine fracture%Anterior surgery way%A posterior approach%Clinical effect
目的 分析探讨后路手术对于脊柱胸腰段骨折的临床治疗效果.方法 选择我院2014年3月~2015年3月之间收治的98例脊柱胸腰段骨折患者作为观察对象,采用随机的方式将其分为观察组和对照组各49例.对照组患者使用前路手术方式进行治疗;观察组患者采用后路手术方式进行治疗.观察对比两组患者的临床治疗效果.结果 观察组患者术后的伤椎前后缘高度比值优于对照组患者、Cobb角度改善情况优于对照组患者、疼痛程度要显著轻于对照组患者,组间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05).同时观察组患者对护理服务的满意度优于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05).结论 对胸腰段骨折患者应用后路手术方式进行治疗具有很好的治疗效果,相对于前路手术方式,患者的治疗总有效率更高、满意度更佳.
目的 分析探討後路手術對于脊柱胸腰段骨摺的臨床治療效果.方法 選擇我院2014年3月~2015年3月之間收治的98例脊柱胸腰段骨摺患者作為觀察對象,採用隨機的方式將其分為觀察組和對照組各49例.對照組患者使用前路手術方式進行治療;觀察組患者採用後路手術方式進行治療.觀察對比兩組患者的臨床治療效果.結果 觀察組患者術後的傷椎前後緣高度比值優于對照組患者、Cobb角度改善情況優于對照組患者、疼痛程度要顯著輕于對照組患者,組間的差異具有統計學意義(P < 0.05).同時觀察組患者對護理服務的滿意度優于對照組患者,差異具有統計學意義(P < 0.05).結論 對胸腰段骨摺患者應用後路手術方式進行治療具有很好的治療效果,相對于前路手術方式,患者的治療總有效率更高、滿意度更佳.
목적 분석탐토후로수술대우척주흉요단골절적림상치료효과.방법 선택아원2014년3월~2015년3월지간수치적98례척주흉요단골절환자작위관찰대상,채용수궤적방식장기분위관찰조화대조조각49례.대조조환자사용전로수술방식진행치료;관찰조환자채용후로수술방식진행치료.관찰대비량조환자적림상치료효과.결과 관찰조환자술후적상추전후연고도비치우우대조조환자、Cobb각도개선정황우우대조조환자、동통정도요현저경우대조조환자,조간적차이구유통계학의의(P < 0.05).동시관찰조환자대호리복무적만의도우우대조조환자,차이구유통계학의의(P < 0.05).결론 대흉요단골절환자응용후로수술방식진행치료구유흔호적치료효과,상대우전로수술방식,환자적치료총유효솔경고、만의도경가.
Objective To analyze posterior approach to the clinical treatment effect of thoracic lumbar spine fractures. Methods Our hospital between March 2014 ~ March 2015 treated 98 cases of patients with fracture of thoracic lumbar spine as research object, USES the random, it can be divided into observation group and control group (n = 49). Control group patients with anterior surgical procedure for treatment; Observation group were treated by posterior surgical procedure for treatment. To observe the clinical therapeutic effect compared two groups of patients. Results The observation group of patients with postoperative wound edge height ratio before and after the job is better than the control group patients, Cobb Angle to improve the situation, degree of pain were significantly better than the control group patients patients with lighter than the control group, the differences between groups with statistical significance (P < 0.05). At the same time observation group of patients to nursing service satisfaction is better than the control group patients, statisticaly significant difference (P < 0.05).Conclusion The application of posterior approach in patients with thoracic lumbar fracture treatment has good therapeutic effect, relative to the anterior surgical procedure, the treatment of patients with total effective rate higher satisfaction, more beautiful.
