水文
水文
수문
HYDROLOGY
2015年
4期
77-84,6
,共9页
水利科技期刊%评价系统%评价指标%比较
水利科技期刊%評價繫統%評價指標%比較
수리과기기간%평개계통%평개지표%비교
water conservancy science and technology journal%evaluation system%evaluation index%comparison
梳理科技期刊在评价体系中的位置,可以更好地为广大作者提供帮助和服务。国内外期刊评价系统《中文核心期刊要目总览》、CSTPCD、CSCD以及SCI、EI、CA、SA、SC、JI、AJ分别收录中国水利科技期刊38种和27种(两者有24种重叠)。通过对收录及与现有(包括未收录)期刊主办单位类型、阅读量和引用量指标、国际化和网络化、属性分类、涵盖学科等进行比较,发现被收录期刊多属全国性学会及学术组织、部属科研院所、全国重点院校等主办,具有学科和人才优势,办刊条件好,编辑力量强,部分期刊有国际编委,网络化程度较高,学术水平较高,影响力较大,大多是中国水利科技期刊中的佼佼者。国内评价系统收录结果殊途同归,相对稳定,相对合理,证明国内评价系统基本科学、合理、可信。但存在收录期刊属性分类和涵盖学科失衡等问题,有待改进。
梳理科技期刊在評價體繫中的位置,可以更好地為廣大作者提供幫助和服務。國內外期刊評價繫統《中文覈心期刊要目總覽》、CSTPCD、CSCD以及SCI、EI、CA、SA、SC、JI、AJ分彆收錄中國水利科技期刊38種和27種(兩者有24種重疊)。通過對收錄及與現有(包括未收錄)期刊主辦單位類型、閱讀量和引用量指標、國際化和網絡化、屬性分類、涵蓋學科等進行比較,髮現被收錄期刊多屬全國性學會及學術組織、部屬科研院所、全國重點院校等主辦,具有學科和人纔優勢,辦刊條件好,編輯力量彊,部分期刊有國際編委,網絡化程度較高,學術水平較高,影響力較大,大多是中國水利科技期刊中的佼佼者。國內評價繫統收錄結果殊途同歸,相對穩定,相對閤理,證明國內評價繫統基本科學、閤理、可信。但存在收錄期刊屬性分類和涵蓋學科失衡等問題,有待改進。
소이과기기간재평개체계중적위치,가이경호지위엄대작자제공방조화복무。국내외기간평개계통《중문핵심기간요목총람》、CSTPCD、CSCD이급SCI、EI、CA、SA、SC、JI、AJ분별수록중국수리과기기간38충화27충(량자유24충중첩)。통과대수록급여현유(포괄미수록)기간주판단위류형、열독량화인용량지표、국제화화망락화、속성분류、함개학과등진행비교,발현피수록기간다속전국성학회급학술조직、부속과연원소、전국중점원교등주판,구유학과화인재우세,판간조건호,편집역량강,부분기간유국제편위,망락화정도교고,학술수평교고,영향력교대,대다시중국수리과기기간중적교교자。국내평개계통수록결과수도동귀,상대은정,상대합리,증명국내평개계통기본과학、합리、가신。단존재수록기간속성분류화함개학과실형등문제,유대개진。
It is more help for the majority authors to analysis the position of sci-tech periodicals in the appraisal system. The peri-odical evaluation systems both at home and abroad like guide to Chinese core journals, CSTPCD, CSCD, SCI, EI, CA, SA, SC, JI, AJ, including 38 kinds and 27 kinds (There are 24 overlaps between them). Through comparing the type of host units, the reading and reference indexes, internationalization and networking,attribute classification, covering subjects of included and not included journals, found that most host units of included journals belong to academic organization, affiliated research institutes, national key universities and colleges. The hosts have advantage of subject and talent, good journal making conditions, high ability editors, higher network degree and academic level, influence widely, some of them have international member of the journal editorial board, most of them are out standing in China water conservancy science and technology journals. The results of domestic evaluation system include all roads lead to Rome, have relatively stable and reasonable, prove that the evaluation systems in China are scientific, reasonable and credi-ble. But need to be improved is that it has imbalance problems of collected periodicals attribute classification and cover subjects.