临床精神医学杂志
臨床精神醫學雜誌
림상정신의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
2015年
4期
244-247
,共4页
崔伟%王学义%崔利军%严保平%成玉敏%张云淑
崔偉%王學義%崔利軍%嚴保平%成玉敏%張雲淑
최위%왕학의%최리군%엄보평%성옥민%장운숙
双相 I 型障碍%攻击行为%风险因素
雙相 I 型障礙%攻擊行為%風險因素
쌍상 I 형장애%공격행위%풍험인소
bipolar type I disorder%aggressive behavior%risk factors
目的:探讨双相 I 型障碍患者攻击行为的风险因素。方法:根据修订版外显攻击行为量表(MOAS)评分将94例住院的双相 I 型障碍患者分为攻击组(50例,加权分≥4分)和非攻击组(44例,加权分﹤4分);对入组者进行一般及临床情况调查、认知功能检测、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)及父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)评定,血脂、血清肌酸激酶(CK)水平检测及脑地形图检查。结果:两组在职业、饮酒、发病间期缓解程度、入院方式、总发作次数、躁狂发作次数、威斯康星卡片分类测验成绩、SSRS评分、EMBU 因子分、血清 CK 水平、脑电地形图结果差异有统计学意义(P ﹤0.05或 P ﹤0.01);多因素Logistic 回归分析筛选出非自愿住院(OR =54.341)、发病间期不完全缓解( OR =19.088)、无业/失业(OR =9.841)、总发作次数≥3次(OR =9.672)是攻击行为的高危因素。结论:多种因素与双相 I 型障碍患者攻击行为有关,无业或失业、疾病反复发作、发病间期不全缓解及非自愿住院可增加攻击行为的发生风险,以非自愿住院相对风险最高。
目的:探討雙相 I 型障礙患者攻擊行為的風險因素。方法:根據脩訂版外顯攻擊行為量錶(MOAS)評分將94例住院的雙相 I 型障礙患者分為攻擊組(50例,加權分≥4分)和非攻擊組(44例,加權分﹤4分);對入組者進行一般及臨床情況調查、認知功能檢測、社會支持評定量錶(SSRS)及父母教養方式評價量錶(EMBU)評定,血脂、血清肌痠激酶(CK)水平檢測及腦地形圖檢查。結果:兩組在職業、飲酒、髮病間期緩解程度、入院方式、總髮作次數、躁狂髮作次數、威斯康星卡片分類測驗成績、SSRS評分、EMBU 因子分、血清 CK 水平、腦電地形圖結果差異有統計學意義(P ﹤0.05或 P ﹤0.01);多因素Logistic 迴歸分析篩選齣非自願住院(OR =54.341)、髮病間期不完全緩解( OR =19.088)、無業/失業(OR =9.841)、總髮作次數≥3次(OR =9.672)是攻擊行為的高危因素。結論:多種因素與雙相 I 型障礙患者攻擊行為有關,無業或失業、疾病反複髮作、髮病間期不全緩解及非自願住院可增加攻擊行為的髮生風險,以非自願住院相對風險最高。
목적:탐토쌍상 I 형장애환자공격행위적풍험인소。방법:근거수정판외현공격행위량표(MOAS)평분장94례주원적쌍상 I 형장애환자분위공격조(50례,가권분≥4분)화비공격조(44례,가권분﹤4분);대입조자진행일반급림상정황조사、인지공능검측、사회지지평정량표(SSRS)급부모교양방식평개량표(EMBU)평정,혈지、혈청기산격매(CK)수평검측급뇌지형도검사。결과:량조재직업、음주、발병간기완해정도、입원방식、총발작차수、조광발작차수、위사강성잡편분류측험성적、SSRS평분、EMBU 인자분、혈청 CK 수평、뇌전지형도결과차이유통계학의의(P ﹤0.05혹 P ﹤0.01);다인소Logistic 회귀분석사선출비자원주원(OR =54.341)、발병간기불완전완해( OR =19.088)、무업/실업(OR =9.841)、총발작차수≥3차(OR =9.672)시공격행위적고위인소。결론:다충인소여쌍상 I 형장애환자공격행위유관,무업혹실업、질병반복발작、발병간기불전완해급비자원주원가증가공격행위적발생풍험,이비자원주원상대풍험최고。
Objective:To explore the risk factors of aggressive behavior in the patients with bipolar type I disorder. Method:According to the score of revised overt aggression scale(MOAS),94 inpatients with bi-polar I disorder were divided into attack group(50 cases,weighted points of MOAS≥4)and the non-attack group(44 cases,weighted points of MOAS ﹤ 4 ). The general and clinical data were investigated,the executive function,social support rating scale(SSRS),egma minnen av bardndosnauppforstran(EMBU)were assessed, the levels of serum lipid,creatine kinase(CK),and brain topographic map were detected in all the subjects. Results:The differences of vocation,drinking,remission situation,admission form,total episode times,the fre-quency of manic episode,level of serum CK,brain atlas,the results of Wisconsin card sorting test,the scores of SSRS and the factor scores of EMBU between the two groups had statistical significance( P ﹤ 0. 05 or P ﹤0. 01). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that involuntary admissions(OR = 54. 341),incomplete remission(OR = 19. 088),unemployment(OR = 9. 841),total episode ≥3 times(OR = 9. 672)were risk fac-tors. Conclusion:Aggressive behavior in patients with bipolar type I disorder is related to many factors. Un-employment,recurrent episodes of mental disorders,incomplete remission and involuntary admissions increased aggressive risk. The relative risk of involuntary admissions is the highest.