华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2015年
4期
352-356
,共5页
包广洁%孔楠楠%郭曼丽%苏雪莲%康宏
包廣潔%孔楠楠%郭曼麗%囌雪蓮%康宏
포엄길%공남남%곽만려%소설련%강굉
原子力显微镜%关节盘细胞%表面形貌%生物力学
原子力顯微鏡%關節盤細胞%錶麵形貌%生物力學
원자력현미경%관절반세포%표면형모%생물역학
atomic force microscopy%temporomandibular joint disc cell%topography%biomechanics
目的:??采用JPK?Nano?Wizard?3型生物原子力显微镜(AFM)对两种类型的山羊颞下颌关节盘细胞(软骨细胞样细胞和成纤维细胞样细胞)的表面形貌和生物力学特性进行研究,为颞下颌关节盘组织工程研究中种子细胞的选择提供依据。方法??单层培养原代山羊颞下颌关节盘细胞,生理状态下用AFM接触模式扫描两种类型的关节盘细胞,获得形貌图。随机选取20个软骨细胞样细胞和成纤维细胞样细胞,扫描获得细胞核区和细胞质区的力-位移曲线,通过JPK?Data?Processing软件分析两种细胞的杨氏模量和黏附力。结果??AFM下,三角形的软骨细胞样细胞的细胞核占据其大部分体积,细胞骨架结构呈树枝状排列,边缘伸出许多伪足;长梭形的成纤维细胞样细胞的细胞核明显高于细胞质区,骨架结构规则排列,边缘光滑,极少有伪足伸出;两种细胞的表面粗糙度没有明显差异。分析力-位移曲线得出:两种类型细胞的杨氏模量在细胞核区没有明显差异(P>0.05),在细胞质区略有差异(P=0.047);但两种细胞的黏附力没有明显差异(P>0.05)。结论??两种类型的关节盘细胞在形貌上虽有较大的差别,但在生物力学特性上的差异并不明显。
目的:??採用JPK?Nano?Wizard?3型生物原子力顯微鏡(AFM)對兩種類型的山羊顳下頜關節盤細胞(軟骨細胞樣細胞和成纖維細胞樣細胞)的錶麵形貌和生物力學特性進行研究,為顳下頜關節盤組織工程研究中種子細胞的選擇提供依據。方法??單層培養原代山羊顳下頜關節盤細胞,生理狀態下用AFM接觸模式掃描兩種類型的關節盤細胞,穫得形貌圖。隨機選取20箇軟骨細胞樣細胞和成纖維細胞樣細胞,掃描穫得細胞覈區和細胞質區的力-位移麯線,通過JPK?Data?Processing軟件分析兩種細胞的楊氏模量和黏附力。結果??AFM下,三角形的軟骨細胞樣細胞的細胞覈佔據其大部分體積,細胞骨架結構呈樹枝狀排列,邊緣伸齣許多偽足;長梭形的成纖維細胞樣細胞的細胞覈明顯高于細胞質區,骨架結構規則排列,邊緣光滑,極少有偽足伸齣;兩種細胞的錶麵粗糙度沒有明顯差異。分析力-位移麯線得齣:兩種類型細胞的楊氏模量在細胞覈區沒有明顯差異(P>0.05),在細胞質區略有差異(P=0.047);但兩種細胞的黏附力沒有明顯差異(P>0.05)。結論??兩種類型的關節盤細胞在形貌上雖有較大的差彆,但在生物力學特性上的差異併不明顯。
목적:??채용JPK?Nano?Wizard?3형생물원자력현미경(AFM)대량충류형적산양섭하합관절반세포(연골세포양세포화성섬유세포양세포)적표면형모화생물역학특성진행연구,위섭하합관절반조직공정연구중충자세포적선택제공의거。방법??단층배양원대산양섭하합관절반세포,생리상태하용AFM접촉모식소묘량충류형적관절반세포,획득형모도。수궤선취20개연골세포양세포화성섬유세포양세포,소묘획득세포핵구화세포질구적력-위이곡선,통과JPK?Data?Processing연건분석량충세포적양씨모량화점부력。결과??AFM하,삼각형적연골세포양세포적세포핵점거기대부분체적,세포골가결구정수지상배렬,변연신출허다위족;장사형적성섬유세포양세포적세포핵명현고우세포질구,골가결구규칙배렬,변연광활,겁소유위족신출;량충세포적표면조조도몰유명현차이。분석력-위이곡선득출:량충류형세포적양씨모량재세포핵구몰유명현차이(P>0.05),재세포질구략유차이(P=0.047);단량충세포적점부력몰유명현차이(P>0.05)。결론??량충류형적관절반세포재형모상수유교대적차별,단재생물역학특성상적차이병불명현。
Objective??This?study?is?performed?to?investigate?the?cell?topographies?and?biomechanical?properties?of?two?different?types?of?temporomandibular?joint?(TMJ)?discs?from?goats?by?using?JPK?Nano?Wizard?3?biological?atomic?force?microscopy?(AFM).?This?process?provides?a?guideline?for?selecting?seed?cells?for?TMJ?disc?tissue?engineering. Methods??TMJ?disc?cells?from?primary?goats?were?cultured?by?monolayer?culture?method.?AFM?was?used?to?contact?scan?the?topographies?of?the?two?types?of?TMJ?disc?cells?under?physiological?environment.?Approximately?20?chondrocyte-like?and?fibroblast-like?cells?were?selected?randomly?to?plot?the?force-versus-distance?curves?of?the?cytoplasm?and?nucleus.?Young’s?modulus?and?adhesion?were?analyzed?by?JPK?Data?Processing.?Results??The?triangle-shapednucleus?of?the?chondrocyte-like?cell?occupied?a?large?portion?of?the?cell.?Cytoskeleton?was?arranged?dendritically?on?the?surface.?Pseudopodia?were?extended?from?cell?edges.?The?spindle-shapednucleus?of?the?fibroblast-like?cell?occupied?a?significantly?larger?region?compared?with?the?cytoplasmic?region.?Cytoskeleton?was?arranged?regularly.?Cell?edges?were?smooth?with?less?pseudopodia?extended.?No?difference?was?found?in?the?surface?roughness?between?the?two?types?of?cells.?According?to?the?force-versus-distance?curves,?the?Young’s?moduli?of?the?two?types?of?cells?were?not?statistically?different?(P>0.05),?but?differences?were?found?in?the?cytoplasmic?regions?(P=0.047).?No?statistical?difference?was?found?in?the?adhesions?between?the?two?types?of?cells?(P>0.05).?Conclusion??The?AFM?topography?and?curves?were?compared?and?analyzed.?The?two?types?of?TMJ?disc?cells?exhibited?significantly?different?topographies,?but?only?slight?difference?in?their?mechanical?abilities.