中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
19期
33-34
,共2页
痛经%针刺%穴位贴敷
痛經%針刺%穴位貼敷
통경%침자%혈위첩부
Dysmenorrhea%Acupuncture%Acupoint sticker
目的:观察比较治疗针刺穴位贴敷组和药物组原发性痛经的临床疗效.方法:将102例患者随机分为针刺穴位贴敷组68例和药物组34例.结果:针刺穴位贴敷组的有效率为97.1%,药物组的有效率为76.5%,两组经比较,差异显著(P<0.05).结论:针刺穴位贴敷组治疗效果明显优于药物组.
目的:觀察比較治療針刺穴位貼敷組和藥物組原髮性痛經的臨床療效.方法:將102例患者隨機分為針刺穴位貼敷組68例和藥物組34例.結果:針刺穴位貼敷組的有效率為97.1%,藥物組的有效率為76.5%,兩組經比較,差異顯著(P<0.05).結論:針刺穴位貼敷組治療效果明顯優于藥物組.
목적:관찰비교치료침자혈위첩부조화약물조원발성통경적림상료효.방법:장102례환자수궤분위침자혈위첩부조68례화약물조34례.결과:침자혈위첩부조적유효솔위97.1%,약물조적유효솔위76.5%,량조경비교,차이현저(P<0.05).결론:침자혈위첩부조치료효과명현우우약물조.
Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of acupuncture and medicine on primary dysmenorrhea. Methods: 102 patients were randomly divided into the acupuncture plus acupoint sticker group of 68 cases and 34 cases of the medicine group. Results: The efficiency in the acupuncture plus acupoint sticking group was 97.1%, and in the medicine group was 76.5%; the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Acupuncture acupoint sticker group is better than the medicine group.
