中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2015年
23期
1-2
,共2页
周海%孙文国%蒋雷鸣%翟春雷
週海%孫文國%蔣雷鳴%翟春雷
주해%손문국%장뢰명%적춘뢰
肾结石%经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术%尿石症%疗效
腎結石%經皮腎鏡鈥激光碎石取石術%尿石癥%療效
신결석%경피신경화격광쇄석취석술%뇨석증%료효
Urinary calculi%Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy holmium laser%Renal function%Effect
目的:探讨微通道经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术(mPCNL)与标准通道经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术(标准通道PCNL)治疗肾结石的临床疗效。方法回顾性研究2012年10月至2014年10月,应用B超引导下mPCNL与标准通道PCNL分别治疗150例肾结石。比较两组患者的手术时间、Ⅰ期结石清除率、术中出血量、术中输血率、肾造瘘管留置时间,观察患者术后有无并发症(迟发型出血、感染等)。结果 mPCNL组与标准通道PCNL组一期分别建立F18和F24肾穿刺通道。标准通道PCNL组手术时间比mPCNL组缩短(P<0.05);单纯肾盂结石Ⅰ期清除率较mPCNL组要高(P<0.05);mPCNL组对多发性肾盏结石患者Ⅰ期结石清除率比标准通道PCNL组高(P<0.05)。mPCNL组术中输血率、肾造瘘管留置时间以及术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术中出血量明显少于标准通道PCNL组(P<0.05)。结论 MPCNL与标准通道PCNL均具有术中损伤小、Ⅰ期结石清除率高、并发症少等优点。标准通道PCNL适合较大的肾盂结石,而肾盏多发结石应首先考虑mPCNL,经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术处理肾结石安全、有效。
目的:探討微通道經皮腎鏡鈥激光碎石取石術(mPCNL)與標準通道經皮腎鏡鈥激光碎石取石術(標準通道PCNL)治療腎結石的臨床療效。方法迴顧性研究2012年10月至2014年10月,應用B超引導下mPCNL與標準通道PCNL分彆治療150例腎結石。比較兩組患者的手術時間、Ⅰ期結石清除率、術中齣血量、術中輸血率、腎造瘺管留置時間,觀察患者術後有無併髮癥(遲髮型齣血、感染等)。結果 mPCNL組與標準通道PCNL組一期分彆建立F18和F24腎穿刺通道。標準通道PCNL組手術時間比mPCNL組縮短(P<0.05);單純腎盂結石Ⅰ期清除率較mPCNL組要高(P<0.05);mPCNL組對多髮性腎盞結石患者Ⅰ期結石清除率比標準通道PCNL組高(P<0.05)。mPCNL組術中輸血率、腎造瘺管留置時間以及術後併髮癥差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但術中齣血量明顯少于標準通道PCNL組(P<0.05)。結論 MPCNL與標準通道PCNL均具有術中損傷小、Ⅰ期結石清除率高、併髮癥少等優點。標準通道PCNL適閤較大的腎盂結石,而腎盞多髮結石應首先攷慮mPCNL,經皮腎鏡鈥激光碎石取石術處理腎結石安全、有效。
목적:탐토미통도경피신경화격광쇄석취석술(mPCNL)여표준통도경피신경화격광쇄석취석술(표준통도PCNL)치료신결석적림상료효。방법회고성연구2012년10월지2014년10월,응용B초인도하mPCNL여표준통도PCNL분별치료150례신결석。비교량조환자적수술시간、Ⅰ기결석청제솔、술중출혈량、술중수혈솔、신조루관류치시간,관찰환자술후유무병발증(지발형출혈、감염등)。결과 mPCNL조여표준통도PCNL조일기분별건립F18화F24신천자통도。표준통도PCNL조수술시간비mPCNL조축단(P<0.05);단순신우결석Ⅰ기청제솔교mPCNL조요고(P<0.05);mPCNL조대다발성신잔결석환자Ⅰ기결석청제솔비표준통도PCNL조고(P<0.05)。mPCNL조술중수혈솔、신조루관류치시간이급술후병발증차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단술중출혈량명현소우표준통도PCNL조(P<0.05)。결론 MPCNL여표준통도PCNL균구유술중손상소、Ⅰ기결석청제솔고、병발증소등우점。표준통도PCNL괄합교대적신우결석,이신잔다발결석응수선고필mPCNL,경피신경화격광쇄석취석술처리신결석안전、유효。
Objective To compare the efficacy and advantages of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(mPCNL)in the treatment of renal calculi,improve the treatment of kidney stones.Methods From October 2012 to October 2014, application of B-guided PCNL was performed in 150 patients and mPCNL in 150 patients. Statistics the stone-free rate and effcts on renal function.Results 18F and 24F percutaneous renal access were successfully established in PCNL and mPCNL group respectively.The PCNL group had a shorter operation time than the mPCNL group. The one-stage stone-free rate for multiple stones was significantly higher in the mPCNL group than in the PCNL group. However, the rate for simple renal pelvis stone was significantly lower in the mPCNL group than in the PCNL group. There was no statistical difference in the one-stage stone-free rate for staghorn stone,complications rate, blood transfusion, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. The blood loss in mPCNL was less than in PCNL group, but the rate of blood transfusion and the remaining was no significant difference.Conclusion The PCNL may be suitable for large renal stone,while mPCNL may has advantages in the treatment for renal calyx stone.