中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2015年
21期
217-218
,共2页
狂犬病%健康教育%知信行%评价
狂犬病%健康教育%知信行%評價
광견병%건강교육%지신행%평개
Rabies%Health education%KAB%Evaluation
目的:评价健康教育对狂犬病暴露者相关知识、态度和行为的干预效果,为开展狂犬病暴露着健康教育工作提供依据。方法对南京市第二医院感染病科全程接种狂犬疫苗对象中随机抽选200人,平均分成干预组和对照组各100人,干预组进行健康教育干预,对照组不进行任何干预,在干预前后进行狂犬病相关知识、态度和行为问卷调查,评价干预效果。结果经干预后,干预组狂犬病相关知识平均总得分明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P <0.001),对照组略有提高,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);干预组与对照组经干预后相关知识总得分差异有统计学意义(P <0.001);干预组干预前后态度有所改变,对照组无明显改变;干预后干预组相关行为正确率高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论健康教育可以有效提高狂犬病暴露者的知信行水平。
目的:評價健康教育對狂犬病暴露者相關知識、態度和行為的榦預效果,為開展狂犬病暴露著健康教育工作提供依據。方法對南京市第二醫院感染病科全程接種狂犬疫苗對象中隨機抽選200人,平均分成榦預組和對照組各100人,榦預組進行健康教育榦預,對照組不進行任何榦預,在榦預前後進行狂犬病相關知識、態度和行為問捲調查,評價榦預效果。結果經榦預後,榦預組狂犬病相關知識平均總得分明顯提高,差異有統計學意義(P <0.001),對照組略有提高,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05);榦預組與對照組經榦預後相關知識總得分差異有統計學意義(P <0.001);榦預組榦預前後態度有所改變,對照組無明顯改變;榦預後榦預組相關行為正確率高于對照組(P <0.05)。結論健康教育可以有效提高狂犬病暴露者的知信行水平。
목적:평개건강교육대광견병폭로자상관지식、태도화행위적간예효과,위개전광견병폭로착건강교육공작제공의거。방법대남경시제이의원감염병과전정접충광견역묘대상중수궤추선200인,평균분성간예조화대조조각100인,간예조진행건강교육간예,대조조불진행임하간예,재간예전후진행광견병상관지식、태도화행위문권조사,평개간예효과。결과경간예후,간예조광견병상관지식평균총득분명현제고,차이유통계학의의(P <0.001),대조조략유제고,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05);간예조여대조조경간예후상관지식총득분차이유통계학의의(P <0.001);간예조간예전후태도유소개변,대조조무명현개변;간예후간예조상관행위정학솔고우대조조(P <0.05)。결론건강교육가이유효제고광견병폭로자적지신행수평。
Objective To evaluate the effect of health education on rabies-related knowledge, attitude and behaviors (KAB) among people exposed to rabies, and provide evidence for conducting health education regarding rabies prevention. Methods Totally 200 persons who had been attacked by animals and received vaccination against rabies virus in department of infectious diseases of The Second Hospital of Nanjing were randomly divided into intervention group and control group (each 100). The sufferers in intervention group received health education regarding rabies prevention, while no intervention was conducted in control group. Questionnaires were used to survey the research participants before and after the intervention, and the effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated. Results After intervention, the average total score of rabies-related knowledge in intervention group rose apparently, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001), while control group was a little, and no statistically significant difference was found (P>0.05). After intervention, there were statistically significant differences in the average total score of rabies-related knowledge between intervention group and control group (P<0.001). The sufferers in intervention group showed a remarkable improvement in attitude after the intervention, but no remarkable improvement was found in the sufferers of control group. After intervention, the correct behavior rate in intervention group is higher than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Conducting health education among people exposed to rabies can effectively improve the levels of KAB.