磁共振成像
磁共振成像
자공진성상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
2015年
8期
581-584
,共4页
乔鹏飞%牛衡%白玉贞%高阳%牛广明
喬鵬飛%牛衡%白玉貞%高暘%牛廣明
교붕비%우형%백옥정%고양%우엄명
布氏杆菌%脊柱炎%磁共振成像%动态增强
佈氏桿菌%脊柱炎%磁共振成像%動態增彊
포씨간균%척주염%자공진성상%동태증강
Brucella%Spondylitis%Magnetic resonance imaging%Dynamic enhancement
目的:探讨动态对比增强磁共振定量成像(dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,DCE-MRI)技术对布氏杆菌性脊椎炎的鉴别诊断价值。材料与方法16例脊椎病变患者(经临床或手术病理证实:11例布氏杆菌性脊椎炎、2例脊椎椎体转移瘤、3例结核性脊椎炎)行T1WI、T2WI、STIR 及动态对比增强定量检查,分析其形态、信号特点及容积转运参数(Ktrans)与血管外细胞外间隙容积比(Ve)。结果病变累及腰椎最多。布氏杆菌性脊椎炎在MRI上椎体形态多无明显变化,椎体边缘可见小的骨质破坏及骨质增生。病变椎体T1WI呈低信号,T2WI呈低等或等高信号或低等高混杂信号。STIR呈高信号。增强扫描病变椎体明显强化,与周围正常增强的椎体信号类似或更高。各类脊椎病变的Ktrans值与Ve值的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论布氏杆菌性脊椎炎有特征性的磁共振表现,动态对比增强磁共振定量成像对鉴别诊断有重要价值。
目的:探討動態對比增彊磁共振定量成像(dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,DCE-MRI)技術對佈氏桿菌性脊椎炎的鑒彆診斷價值。材料與方法16例脊椎病變患者(經臨床或手術病理證實:11例佈氏桿菌性脊椎炎、2例脊椎椎體轉移瘤、3例結覈性脊椎炎)行T1WI、T2WI、STIR 及動態對比增彊定量檢查,分析其形態、信號特點及容積轉運參數(Ktrans)與血管外細胞外間隙容積比(Ve)。結果病變纍及腰椎最多。佈氏桿菌性脊椎炎在MRI上椎體形態多無明顯變化,椎體邊緣可見小的骨質破壞及骨質增生。病變椎體T1WI呈低信號,T2WI呈低等或等高信號或低等高混雜信號。STIR呈高信號。增彊掃描病變椎體明顯彊化,與週圍正常增彊的椎體信號類似或更高。各類脊椎病變的Ktrans值與Ve值的差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論佈氏桿菌性脊椎炎有特徵性的磁共振錶現,動態對比增彊磁共振定量成像對鑒彆診斷有重要價值。
목적:탐토동태대비증강자공진정량성상(dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,DCE-MRI)기술대포씨간균성척추염적감별진단개치。재료여방법16례척추병변환자(경림상혹수술병리증실:11례포씨간균성척추염、2례척추추체전이류、3례결핵성척추염)행T1WI、T2WI、STIR 급동태대비증강정량검사,분석기형태、신호특점급용적전운삼수(Ktrans)여혈관외세포외간극용적비(Ve)。결과병변루급요추최다。포씨간균성척추염재MRI상추체형태다무명현변화,추체변연가견소적골질파배급골질증생。병변추체T1WI정저신호,T2WI정저등혹등고신호혹저등고혼잡신호。STIR정고신호。증강소묘병변추체명현강화,여주위정상증강적추체신호유사혹경고。각류척추병변적Ktrans치여Ve치적차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론포씨간균성척추염유특정성적자공진표현,동태대비증강자공진정량성상대감별진단유중요개치。
AbstractObjective:To explore the value ofdynamiccontrastenhanced(DCE) MRI in differential diagnosis of brucellosis spondylitis. Materials and Methods:Sixteen cases with spinal lesions(proved by clinically or histologically: 11 cases were brucellosis spondylitis, 2 cases were vertebral metastases, 3 cases were tuberculous spondylitis) received T1WI, T2WI, STIR and DCE-MRI examination. Morphological and MRI features were analyzed.Results:The lesions were mainly located in the lumbar vertebrae. In the MRI of brucellosis spondylitis, morphology of vertebral body was almost normal. Bone destruction and osteophyte were detected in the rim of vertebral body. The affected vertebral body showed hypointense on T1WI, hypointense, isointense, hyperintense or heterogeneous intense on T2WI and hyperintense on STIR. After injection of contrast media, signal of affected vertebral body was similar to or higher than that of adjacent vertebral body. There were signiifcant differences between the different spinal lesions for Ktrans values and Ve values (P<0.05).Conclusion:Brucellosis spondylitism has some MRI characteristics. DCE-MRI has signiifcant value in the differential diagnosis of brucellosis spondylitis.