中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2015年
21期
2560-2563
,共4页
根管充填%牙瓷料%牙周炎
根管充填%牙瓷料%牙週炎
근관충전%아자료%아주염
Root canal obturation%Dental porcelain%Periodontitis
目的:探讨生物陶瓷材料iRoot SP糊剂在根管填充中的效果。方法选取2013年5月—2014年5月河北医科大学第二医院于门诊就诊的牙髓炎、根尖周炎患者153例,共计153颗患牙,将患牙根据完全随机设计分为A、B、 C组,每组51颗。 A组用iRoot SP糊剂作为根管填充糊剂和牙胶尖进行根管填充, B组用Vitapex糊剂作为根管填充糊剂和牙胶尖进行根管填充,C组用氧化锌丁香油糊剂作为根管填充糊剂和牙胶尖进行根管填充。比较3组根管填充后1d、7d、3个月后的疗效。结果3组根管填充后1d、7d疗效比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05); A、 B组根管填充后1 d、7 dⅡ级发生率均低于C组(P<0.017)。3组根管填充后3个月疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 iRoot SP糊剂在根管填充中的短期疗效优于氧化锌丁香油糊剂,与Vitapex糊剂相似,提示iRoot SP糊剂是一种良好有效的根管封闭剂,在根管填充中发挥了良好作用,不良反应发生率低,值得在临床治疗中推广。
目的:探討生物陶瓷材料iRoot SP糊劑在根管填充中的效果。方法選取2013年5月—2014年5月河北醫科大學第二醫院于門診就診的牙髓炎、根尖週炎患者153例,共計153顆患牙,將患牙根據完全隨機設計分為A、B、 C組,每組51顆。 A組用iRoot SP糊劑作為根管填充糊劑和牙膠尖進行根管填充, B組用Vitapex糊劑作為根管填充糊劑和牙膠尖進行根管填充,C組用氧化鋅丁香油糊劑作為根管填充糊劑和牙膠尖進行根管填充。比較3組根管填充後1d、7d、3箇月後的療效。結果3組根管填充後1d、7d療效比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05); A、 B組根管填充後1 d、7 dⅡ級髮生率均低于C組(P<0.017)。3組根管填充後3箇月療效比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 iRoot SP糊劑在根管填充中的短期療效優于氧化鋅丁香油糊劑,與Vitapex糊劑相似,提示iRoot SP糊劑是一種良好有效的根管封閉劑,在根管填充中髮揮瞭良好作用,不良反應髮生率低,值得在臨床治療中推廣。
목적:탐토생물도자재료iRoot SP호제재근관전충중적효과。방법선취2013년5월—2014년5월하북의과대학제이의원우문진취진적아수염、근첨주염환자153례,공계153과환아,장환아근거완전수궤설계분위A、B、 C조,매조51과。 A조용iRoot SP호제작위근관전충호제화아효첨진행근관전충, B조용Vitapex호제작위근관전충호제화아효첨진행근관전충,C조용양화자정향유호제작위근관전충호제화아효첨진행근관전충。비교3조근관전충후1d、7d、3개월후적료효。결과3조근관전충후1d、7d료효비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05); A、 B조근관전충후1 d、7 dⅡ급발생솔균저우C조(P<0.017)。3조근관전충후3개월료효비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 iRoot SP호제재근관전충중적단기료효우우양화자정향유호제,여Vitapex호제상사,제시iRoot SP호제시일충량호유효적근관봉폐제,재근관전충중발휘료량호작용,불량반응발생솔저,치득재림상치료중추엄。
Objective To investigate the efficacy of biological ceramic material iRoot SP in root canal filling.Methods The study enrolled 153 patients with pulpitis or periapical periodontitis who received treatment in the outpatient department in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from May 2013 to May 2014.A total of 153 teeth were included in the study, andthey were divided into group A, group B and group C, with 51 teeth in each group.In group A, iRoot SP was used as the rootcanal filling paste and gutta percha point.In group B, Vitapex was used as the root canal filling paste and gutta percha point.Ingroup C, zinc oxide eugenol was used as the root canal filling paste and gutta percha point.Comparison of the efficacy of 1 d, 7 dand 3 months after root canal filling in the 3 groups.Results The three groups were significantly different in the 1 d and 7 defficacy (P <0.05) .Group A and group B were lower than group C in 1 d and 7 d incidence of level Ⅱ symptoms (P <0.017).The three groups were not significantly different in efficacy within 3 months after root canal filling (P >0.05). Conclusion In root canal filling, iRoot SP has better short -term efficacy than zinc oxide eugenol and has similar efficacy withVitapex.The study recommend iRoot SP as an effective root canal sealing agent, since it plays a well role in root canal filling andhas low incidence of adverse reaction.It is worth promotion in clinical treatment.