口腔医学
口腔醫學
구강의학
STOMATOLOGY
2015年
8期
685-687
,共3页
张凌%朱琳琳%成超%张梦龙
張凌%硃琳琳%成超%張夢龍
장릉%주림림%성초%장몽룡
再治疗%镍-钛锉%牙本质
再治療%鎳-鈦銼%牙本質
재치료%얼-태촤%아본질
retreatment%nickel-titanium files%root dentin
目的:研究再治疗术根管再预备对根管壁损伤的影响。方法160颗正畸拔除的前磨牙随机分为2组,各80颗,分别在拔除1个月(A 组),半年后(B 组)行根管治疗、再治疗;A 组再随机分为根管治疗组(A1组)再治疗组(A2组),每组40颗,B 组同样分为根管治疗组(B1组)再治疗组(B2组);A2和B2组又分为单独ProTaper 再治疗锉组(A21、B21)、ProTaper再治疗锉辅助使用氯仿组(A22、B22)。牙根在显微镜下切断并检查。结果再治疗组的根管壁损伤明显高于根管治疗组;与ProTaper 再治疗锉单独使用比较,辅助使用氯仿组有明显的差异,使用氯仿可以减少再预备过程对根管壁的损伤。结论根管再治疗会比根管治疗造成更多的根管损伤。当评估根管再治疗时,应考虑牙壁损伤的潜在风险。
目的:研究再治療術根管再預備對根管壁損傷的影響。方法160顆正畸拔除的前磨牙隨機分為2組,各80顆,分彆在拔除1箇月(A 組),半年後(B 組)行根管治療、再治療;A 組再隨機分為根管治療組(A1組)再治療組(A2組),每組40顆,B 組同樣分為根管治療組(B1組)再治療組(B2組);A2和B2組又分為單獨ProTaper 再治療銼組(A21、B21)、ProTaper再治療銼輔助使用氯倣組(A22、B22)。牙根在顯微鏡下切斷併檢查。結果再治療組的根管壁損傷明顯高于根管治療組;與ProTaper 再治療銼單獨使用比較,輔助使用氯倣組有明顯的差異,使用氯倣可以減少再預備過程對根管壁的損傷。結論根管再治療會比根管治療造成更多的根管損傷。噹評估根管再治療時,應攷慮牙壁損傷的潛在風險。
목적:연구재치료술근관재예비대근관벽손상적영향。방법160과정기발제적전마아수궤분위2조,각80과,분별재발제1개월(A 조),반년후(B 조)행근관치료、재치료;A 조재수궤분위근관치료조(A1조)재치료조(A2조),매조40과,B 조동양분위근관치료조(B1조)재치료조(B2조);A2화B2조우분위단독ProTaper 재치료촤조(A21、B21)、ProTaper재치료촤보조사용록방조(A22、B22)。아근재현미경하절단병검사。결과재치료조적근관벽손상명현고우근관치료조;여ProTaper 재치료촤단독사용비교,보조사용록방조유명현적차이,사용록방가이감소재예비과정대근관벽적손상。결론근관재치료회비근관치료조성경다적근관손상。당평고근관재치료시,응고필아벽손상적잠재풍험。
Objective To explore the influence of root canal retreatment procedures on the appearance of defects on the root canal walls. Methods One hundred and sixty premolars extracted for orthodontics were randomly divided into two groups with 80 in each group. They were treated and retreated a month(A group)and half a year(B group)after extraction. Forty teeth (A1 group)in A group were treated and the other 40 (A2 group)were retreated at random,and B group was divided into B1 group and B2 group in the same way. Among retreated teeth,twenty teeth filling materials were removed by ProTaper retreatment files only(A21 group,B21 group)and the other twenty teeth were removed by ProTaper retreatment files with chloroform(A22 group,B22 group). Roots were then sectioned and inspected under a microscope. Results Retreatment groups showed significantly more defects than the initial treatment group. There was difference in the appearance of defects after retreatment between ProTaper retreatment files only group and chloroform-sup-plied group. Conclusions Retreatment procedures result in more defects than initial treatment. When assessing the outcomes of endo-dontic retreatment,the substantial damage to the root canal walls should be considered.