中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
23期
46-48
,共3页
免疫组化技术%常规技术%病理诊断%诊断效果
免疫組化技術%常規技術%病理診斷%診斷效果
면역조화기술%상규기술%병리진단%진단효과
Immunohistochemical technique%Routine technique%Pathological diagnosis%Diagnostic effect
目的：探讨免疫组化技术和常规技术在病理诊断中的临床诊断效果。方法对我院收治的56例肿瘤患者的资料进行分析,根据不同病理诊断方法将患者分为对照组(n=28)和实验组(n=28),对照组采用活检穿刺法诊断,实验组采用免疫组化技术诊断,比较两种方法诊断的阳性率。结果实验组免疫组化染色后,患者的细胞结构为变异型,甲胎蛋白、磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖-3表达异常者为24例,阳性率为85.7%,显著高于对照组(14例,50.0%)；实验组满意率为82.1%,显著高于对照组(57.1%)；实验组诊断后心理顾虑评分为(87.43±4.29)分,生理问题评分为(88.30±9.10)分,信任感评分为(91.34±10.77)分,显著高于对照组[(69.98±3.45)、(70.11±4.36)、(72.37±5.89)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肿瘤患者进行病理诊断时实施免疫组化技术诊断效果理想,值得推广使用。
目的：探討免疫組化技術和常規技術在病理診斷中的臨床診斷效果。方法對我院收治的56例腫瘤患者的資料進行分析,根據不同病理診斷方法將患者分為對照組(n=28)和實驗組(n=28),對照組採用活檢穿刺法診斷,實驗組採用免疫組化技術診斷,比較兩種方法診斷的暘性率。結果實驗組免疫組化染色後,患者的細胞結構為變異型,甲胎蛋白、燐脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖-3錶達異常者為24例,暘性率為85.7%,顯著高于對照組(14例,50.0%)；實驗組滿意率為82.1%,顯著高于對照組(57.1%)；實驗組診斷後心理顧慮評分為(87.43±4.29)分,生理問題評分為(88.30±9.10)分,信任感評分為(91.34±10.77)分,顯著高于對照組[(69.98±3.45)、(70.11±4.36)、(72.37±5.89)分],差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論腫瘤患者進行病理診斷時實施免疫組化技術診斷效果理想,值得推廣使用。
목적：탐토면역조화기술화상규기술재병리진단중적림상진단효과。방법대아원수치적56례종류환자적자료진행분석,근거불동병리진단방법장환자분위대조조(n=28)화실험조(n=28),대조조채용활검천자법진단,실험조채용면역조화기술진단,비교량충방법진단적양성솔。결과실험조면역조화염색후,환자적세포결구위변이형,갑태단백、린지선기순단백취당-3표체이상자위24례,양성솔위85.7%,현저고우대조조(14례,50.0%)；실험조만의솔위82.1%,현저고우대조조(57.1%)；실험조진단후심리고필평분위(87.43±4.29)분,생리문제평분위(88.30±9.10)분,신임감평분위(91.34±10.77)분,현저고우대조조[(69.98±3.45)、(70.11±4.36)、(72.37±5.89)분],차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론종류환자진행병리진단시실시면역조화기술진단효과이상,치득추엄사용。
Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic effect of immunohistochemical technique and routine technique on the pathological diagnosis. Methods 56 cancer patients admitted into our hospital were analyzed.According to dif-ferent pathological diagnostic methods,they were divided into control group (n=28) and experimental group (n=28).In the control group,biopsy puncture for diagnosis was applied,while in the experimental group,immunohistochemical technique for diagnosis was adopted.The positive diagnostic rate of these two methods was compared. Results In the experimental group,after immunohistochemical staining,cell structure was in variance,24 cases were abnormal expression for AFP and Glypican-3,and the positive rate was 85.7%,which was significantly higher than that in the control group (14 cases, 50.0%).The satisfaction rate in the experimental group was 82.1%,which was much higher than that in the control group accounting for 57.1%.In the experimental group,after diagnosis,the scores of psychological concerns,physiological as-pects,and sense of trust were (87.43±4.29),(88.30±9.10),(91.34±10.77) points,which were all greatly higher than those in the control group [(69.98±3.45),(70.11±4.36),(72.37±5.89) points],there were all statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of implementing immunohistochemical technique for pathological diagnosis in cancer pa-tients is optimal,which is worthy of promotion.
