绿色科技
綠色科技
록색과기
LVSE DASHIJIU
2015年
8期
161-163
,共3页
马尾松%坡位%人工林%差异
馬尾鬆%坡位%人工林%差異
마미송%파위%인공림%차이
Pinus massoniana%slope position%plantation%differences
对不同坡位之间16年生的马尾松(Pinus massoniana lamb .)人工林进行了生长差异分析,结果表明:不同坡位之间胸径、树高和单株材积均值均有极显著差异。下坡位种植的马尾松生长情况最佳,中坡位次之,上坡位最差,各指标均值随坡位的上升而下降。上坡位的植株个体之间分化较大,随坡位下降个体之间分化程度降低。下坡位胸径均值为22.81cm ,分别比中坡位与上坡位高12.62%和20.61%;下坡位树高均值为13.28m ,分别比中坡位与上坡位高4.01%和9.87%;下坡位单株材积均值达0.2978m2,中坡位与上坡位的单株材积分别为0.2003m2和0.1265m2,下坡位的单株材积分别比中坡位与上坡位的下降32.72%和57.53%。
對不同坡位之間16年生的馬尾鬆(Pinus massoniana lamb .)人工林進行瞭生長差異分析,結果錶明:不同坡位之間胸徑、樹高和單株材積均值均有極顯著差異。下坡位種植的馬尾鬆生長情況最佳,中坡位次之,上坡位最差,各指標均值隨坡位的上升而下降。上坡位的植株箇體之間分化較大,隨坡位下降箇體之間分化程度降低。下坡位胸徑均值為22.81cm ,分彆比中坡位與上坡位高12.62%和20.61%;下坡位樹高均值為13.28m ,分彆比中坡位與上坡位高4.01%和9.87%;下坡位單株材積均值達0.2978m2,中坡位與上坡位的單株材積分彆為0.2003m2和0.1265m2,下坡位的單株材積分彆比中坡位與上坡位的下降32.72%和57.53%。
대불동파위지간16년생적마미송(Pinus massoniana lamb .)인공림진행료생장차이분석,결과표명:불동파위지간흉경、수고화단주재적균치균유겁현저차이。하파위충식적마미송생장정황최가,중파위차지,상파위최차,각지표균치수파위적상승이하강。상파위적식주개체지간분화교대,수파위하강개체지간분화정도강저。하파위흉경균치위22.81cm ,분별비중파위여상파위고12.62%화20.61%;하파위수고균치위13.28m ,분별비중파위여상파위고4.01%화9.87%;하파위단주재적균치체0.2978m2,중파위여상파위적단주재적분별위0.2003m2화0.1265m2,하파위적단주재적분별비중파위여상파위적하강32.72%화57.53%。
The article analyzes the growth differences of 16a Pinus massoniana plantation at different slope positions . The results show that there are significant differences in DBH ,tree height and individual volume at different slope positions .The growth at downslope is the best ,then following by the mid -slope and uoslope .These indexes are significantly decreasing along with the rising of slope position .Differentiation at upslope is greater ,but with the decrease of slope ,the degree of differentiation decreases .The average DBH at downslope is 22 .81 cm ,which is larger than that at id -slope and upslope by 12 .62% and 20 .61% respectively ;The average tree height at downslope is 13 .28m ,w hich is higher than that at mid -slope and upslope by 4 .01% and 9 .87% respectively ;T he average individual volume at upslope ,mid -slope and upslope is respectively 0 .1265m3 ,0 .2003m3 and 0 .1265m3 ,which show s that the individual volume at dow nslope decreases by 32 .72% and 57 .53% respectively compared to that of mid-slope and dow nslope .