中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
23期
86-88
,共3页
常规护理%中医护理%膝骨性关节炎%临床效果
常規護理%中醫護理%膝骨性關節炎%臨床效果
상규호리%중의호리%슬골성관절염%림상효과
Routine nursing care%Traditional Chinese medicine nursing%Knee osteoarthritis%Clinical effect
目的：探讨中医护理模式在膝骨性关节炎患者中的护理效果。方法：对本院2013年4月-2014年4月收治的200例膝骨性关节炎患者的临床资料进行分析，根据不同护理方法将其分为对照组和试验组，每组100例。对照组实施常规护理，试验组实施中医护理，比较两组护理效果。结果：经护理后，试验组的护理总有效率95.0%明显高于对照组的75.0%，差异有统计学意义（χ2=6.48，P<0.01）；试验组患者对疗效满意度95.0%明显高于对照组的65.0%，差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.59，P<0.01）。试验组的关节疼痛指数、关节肿胀指数为（8.6±0.5）、（9.0±0.3）分，均明显低于对照组，且试验组关节活动指数（9.4±0.1）分明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组的ADL评分、躯体功能评分，心理功能评分、社会功能评分分别为（16.2±3.7）、（59.6±7.5）、（65.8±9.2）、（57.2±6.5）分，均明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组有3例出现并发症，并发症发生率为3.0%，明显低于对照组的10.0%（10/100），差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.0313，P=0.0447）。结论：膝骨性关节炎患者治疗过程中实施中医护理模式疗效确切，值得推广使用。
目的：探討中醫護理模式在膝骨性關節炎患者中的護理效果。方法：對本院2013年4月-2014年4月收治的200例膝骨性關節炎患者的臨床資料進行分析，根據不同護理方法將其分為對照組和試驗組，每組100例。對照組實施常規護理，試驗組實施中醫護理，比較兩組護理效果。結果：經護理後，試驗組的護理總有效率95.0%明顯高于對照組的75.0%，差異有統計學意義（χ2=6.48，P<0.01）；試驗組患者對療效滿意度95.0%明顯高于對照組的65.0%，差異有統計學意義（χ2=4.59，P<0.01）。試驗組的關節疼痛指數、關節腫脹指數為（8.6±0.5）、（9.0±0.3）分，均明顯低于對照組，且試驗組關節活動指數（9.4±0.1）分明顯高于對照組，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。試驗組的ADL評分、軀體功能評分，心理功能評分、社會功能評分分彆為（16.2±3.7）、（59.6±7.5）、（65.8±9.2）、（57.2±6.5）分，均明顯高于對照組，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。試驗組有3例齣現併髮癥，併髮癥髮生率為3.0%，明顯低于對照組的10.0%（10/100），差異有統計學意義（χ2=4.0313，P=0.0447）。結論：膝骨性關節炎患者治療過程中實施中醫護理模式療效確切，值得推廣使用。
목적：탐토중의호리모식재슬골성관절염환자중적호리효과。방법：대본원2013년4월-2014년4월수치적200례슬골성관절염환자적림상자료진행분석，근거불동호리방법장기분위대조조화시험조，매조100례。대조조실시상규호리，시험조실시중의호리，비교량조호리효과。결과：경호리후，시험조적호리총유효솔95.0%명현고우대조조적75.0%，차이유통계학의의（χ2=6.48，P<0.01）；시험조환자대료효만의도95.0%명현고우대조조적65.0%，차이유통계학의의（χ2=4.59，P<0.01）。시험조적관절동통지수、관절종창지수위（8.6±0.5）、（9.0±0.3）분，균명현저우대조조，차시험조관절활동지수（9.4±0.1）분명현고우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。시험조적ADL평분、구체공능평분，심리공능평분、사회공능평분분별위（16.2±3.7）、（59.6±7.5）、（65.8±9.2）、（57.2±6.5）분，균명현고우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。시험조유3례출현병발증，병발증발생솔위3.0%，명현저우대조조적10.0%（10/100），차이유통계학의의（χ2=4.0313，P=0.0447）。결론：슬골성관절염환자치료과정중실시중의호리모식료효학절，치득추엄사용。
Objective:To investigate the nursing efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine nursing mode in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Method:The clinical data of 200 patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted to our hospital were analyzed from April 2013 to April 2014,they were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group according to different nursing methods,100 cases in each group.The control group was given conventional nursing,the experimental group was given traditional Chinese medicine nursing,the nursing effects were compared between the two groups.Result:After nursing,the total nursing efficiency of the experimental group was 95.0%,which was significantly higher than 75.0% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant( χ2=6.48,P<0.01).The curative effect satisfaction of the experimental group was 95.0%, which was significantly higher than 65.0% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant( χ2=4.59,P<0.01). The joint pain index and joint swelling index in the experimental group were (8.6±0.5)scores and (9.0±0.3)scores,which were significantly lower than the control group,the joint activity index of the experimental group was (9.4±0.1)scores,which was significantly higher than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The ADL score,physical function score,psychological function score and social function score of the experimental group were (16.2±3.7)scores, (59.6±7.5)scores,(65.8±9.2)scores and (57.2±6.5)scores,which were significantly higher than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). There were 3 cases of complications in the experimental group, the incidence rate of complications was 3.0%,which was significantly lower than 10.0% (10/100)of the control group,the difference was statistically significant( χ2=4.0313,P=0.0447).Conclusion:The effect of traditional Chinese medicine nursing mode in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis is effective,it is worth to promote the use.
