地质通报
地質通報
지질통보
GEOLOGICAL BULLETIN OF CHINA
2015年
8期
1447-1459
,共13页
曹玉亭%刘良%王超%康磊%杨文强%梁莎%廖小莹%王亚伟
曹玉亭%劉良%王超%康磊%楊文彊%樑莎%廖小瑩%王亞偉
조옥정%류량%왕초%강뢰%양문강%량사%료소형%왕아위
南阿尔金%高压-超高压岩石%长城系%巴什库尔干岩群%LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年
南阿爾金%高壓-超高壓巖石%長城繫%巴什庫爾榦巖群%LA-ICP-MS鋯石U-Pb定年
남아이금%고압-초고압암석%장성계%파십고이간암군%LA-ICP-MS고석U-Pb정년
southern Altyn Mountains%HP-UHP rock%Changcheng System%Bashikourgan rock group%LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating
采用LA-ICP-MS微区原位锆石U-Pb同位素测定技术,测得木纳布拉克地区原划长城系巴什库尔干岩群红柳泉组的二云二长片麻岩和扎斯勘赛河组二云石英片岩的原岩形成年龄分别介于498~840Ma和500~647Ma之间,表明这2种岩石原岩的形成时代均为新元古代,而不是之前认为的中元古代。另外,红柳泉组二云二长片麻岩边部锆石表现为重稀土元素相对富集型稀土配分模式,其Th/U值大部分小于0.1,为变质锆石,测得其变质时代为498±4Ma,与该地区高压麻粒岩的峰期变质时代(486±5Ma)一致,且与南阿尔金阿尔金岩群中的高压-超高压岩石的峰期变质时代一致,推断其为阿尔金俯冲碰撞引发的高压-超高压变质作用的产物,属于南阿尔金高压-超高压变质带的一部分。通过原岩残留碎屑锆石的年代学对比,发现研究区内这2种岩石及已发现的高压麻粒岩均具有与阿尔金岩群相似的锆石年龄信息,表明本区红柳泉组和扎斯勘赛河组的这3种岩石不应再划归为中元古代的长城系巴什库尔干岩群,将其归属为阿尔金岩群更为合适。
採用LA-ICP-MS微區原位鋯石U-Pb同位素測定技術,測得木納佈拉剋地區原劃長城繫巴什庫爾榦巖群紅柳泉組的二雲二長片痳巖和扎斯勘賽河組二雲石英片巖的原巖形成年齡分彆介于498~840Ma和500~647Ma之間,錶明這2種巖石原巖的形成時代均為新元古代,而不是之前認為的中元古代。另外,紅柳泉組二雲二長片痳巖邊部鋯石錶現為重稀土元素相對富集型稀土配分模式,其Th/U值大部分小于0.1,為變質鋯石,測得其變質時代為498±4Ma,與該地區高壓痳粒巖的峰期變質時代(486±5Ma)一緻,且與南阿爾金阿爾金巖群中的高壓-超高壓巖石的峰期變質時代一緻,推斷其為阿爾金俯遲踫撞引髮的高壓-超高壓變質作用的產物,屬于南阿爾金高壓-超高壓變質帶的一部分。通過原巖殘留碎屑鋯石的年代學對比,髮現研究區內這2種巖石及已髮現的高壓痳粒巖均具有與阿爾金巖群相似的鋯石年齡信息,錶明本區紅柳泉組和扎斯勘賽河組的這3種巖石不應再劃歸為中元古代的長城繫巴什庫爾榦巖群,將其歸屬為阿爾金巖群更為閤適。
채용LA-ICP-MS미구원위고석U-Pb동위소측정기술,측득목납포랍극지구원화장성계파십고이간암군홍류천조적이운이장편마암화찰사감새하조이운석영편암적원암형성년령분별개우498~840Ma화500~647Ma지간,표명저2충암석원암적형성시대균위신원고대,이불시지전인위적중원고대。령외,홍류천조이운이장편마암변부고석표현위중희토원소상대부집형희토배분모식,기Th/U치대부분소우0.1,위변질고석,측득기변질시대위498±4Ma,여해지구고압마립암적봉기변질시대(486±5Ma)일치,차여남아이금아이금암군중적고압-초고압암석적봉기변질시대일치,추단기위아이금부충팽당인발적고압-초고압변질작용적산물,속우남아이금고압-초고압변질대적일부분。통과원암잔류쇄설고석적년대학대비,발현연구구내저2충암석급이발현적고압마립암균구유여아이금암군상사적고석년령신식,표명본구홍류천조화찰사감새하조적저3충암석불응재화귀위중원고대적장성계파십고이간암군,장기귀속위아이금암군경위합괄。
LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yielded the protolith ages of 498~840Ma and 500~647Ma respectively for the two-mi?ca monzonitic gneiss in Hongliuquan Formation and the mica quartz schist in Zhasikansayi Formation from Bashikourgan rock group in Munabulake area, southern Altyn Mountains, indicating that the formation ages of the two rocks are Neoproterozoic rather than Mesoproterozoic. The zircon rims of the two-mica monzonitic gneiss exhibit HREE enrichment pattern, with Th/U ratios less than 0.1, showing the characteristics of metamorphic zircon. Zircon U-Pb dating yielded the metamorphic age of 498 ± 4Ma, which is identical to the peak metamorphic age of the HP granulite in this area and that of the HP-UHP metamorphic rocks in southern Al?tyn Mountains, suggesting that the rock should be the product of the deep subduction of southern Altyn Mountains. The two-mica monzonitic gneiss and two-mica quartz schist in this study and the HP granulite in Munabulake area recorded similar age information to the Altyn complex, implying that the three rocks belong to the Altyn complex rather than to the Bashikourgan rock group. There?fore, the Bashikourgan rock group should be disintegrated, and some of this rock group should be assigned to the southwest part of the Altyn complex. The reason for the disintegration of the Altyn complex was that the south Altyn subducted slab was exhumed and broken up at ca.450Ma, which resulted in the mantle magma upwelling. The upwelling mafic magma formed the present Munabu?lake mafic-ultramafic rock and separated the Altyn complex into two parts.