CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨在小儿发热不同时期应用循证护理的干预疗效分析。方法选取我院从2013年1月到2014年7月入院治疗的95例发热患儿做为研究对象。按照入院顺序随机分为治疗组47例与对照组48例，对照组患儿应用常规发热护理干预方法治疗，治疗组患儿应用不同时期循证护理干预方法治疗。对比两组患儿的护理干预效果及并发症发生情况。结果治疗组患儿的治疗总有效率显著高于对照组患儿，差异具统计学意义（ P ＜0．05）。治疗组患儿护理干预后并发症发生率低于对照组患儿，差异具统计学意义（ P ＜0．05）。结论在小儿发热不同时期应用循证护理干预方法治疗，临床效果显著，并发症少发，值得广泛推广应用。
목적：탐토재소인발열불동시기응용순증호리적간예료효분석。방법선취아원종2013년1월도2014년7월입원치료적95례발열환인주위연구대상。안조입원순서수궤분위치료조47례여대조조48례，대조조환인응용상규발열호리간예방법치료，치료조환인응용불동시기순증호리간예방법치료。대비량조환인적호리간예효과급병발증발생정황。결과치료조환인적치료총유효솔현저고우대조조환인，차이구통계학의의（ P ＜0．05）。치료조환인호리간예후병발증발생솔저우대조조환인，차이구통계학의의（ P ＜0．05）。결론재소인발열불동시기응용순증호리간예방법치료，림상효과현저，병발증소발，치득엄범추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the effect of different intervention in children with fever during the period of application of evidence‐based nursing analysis .Methods 95 cases of fever were selected in our hospital from 2013 January to 2014 July in the hospital as the research object .According to the order of admission were randomly divided into treatment group 47 cases and control group of 48 cases ,the control group using conventional heating treatment methods of nursing intervention ,the treatment group in differ‐ent periods of application of evidence‐based nursing intervention therapy .T he occurrence of nursing inter‐vention effect and complications of the two groups were compared .Results The treatment group with the total effective rate was significantly higher than that in control group ,the difference was statistically sig‐nificant ( P < 0 .05) .The intervention complication rate was lower than the control group patients nurs‐ing treatment ,the difference was statistically significant ( P< 0 .05) .Conclusion In children with fever in different periods of application of evidence‐based nursing intervention treatment ,significant clinical effect , less complications ,and is worth widely used .