山东医学高等专科学校学报
山東醫學高等專科學校學報
산동의학고등전과학교학보
JOURNAL OF SHANDONG MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
3期
198-200
,共3页
自锁托槽%矫治器%牙周指数
自鎖託槽%矯治器%牙週指數
자쇄탁조%교치기%아주지수
Self-ligating brackets%Orthodontic appliances%Periodontal indices
目的:比较自锁托槽与传统托槽对患者牙周健康的影响。方法选取12~18岁正畸患者50例,按矫治器类型分为两组:A组,25例戴用传统托槽矫治的患者;B组,25例戴用自锁托槽矫治的患者。分别于治疗前和治疗中1个月、3个月、6个月时检测两组患者的各项牙周指数(G I , PLI ,SBI ,PD)。结果矫治前,两组患者各项牙周指数无显著性差异( P >0.05);矫治过程中,两组患者的菌斑指数(PLI)有显著性差异( P <0.05),其余牙周指数(GI ,SBI ,PD)无显著性差异( P>0.05)。结论自锁托槽与传统托槽相比,在口腔卫生的维护方面更有优势,但二者对患者其他牙周健康的影响无明显区别。
目的:比較自鎖託槽與傳統託槽對患者牙週健康的影響。方法選取12~18歲正畸患者50例,按矯治器類型分為兩組:A組,25例戴用傳統託槽矯治的患者;B組,25例戴用自鎖託槽矯治的患者。分彆于治療前和治療中1箇月、3箇月、6箇月時檢測兩組患者的各項牙週指數(G I , PLI ,SBI ,PD)。結果矯治前,兩組患者各項牙週指數無顯著性差異( P >0.05);矯治過程中,兩組患者的菌斑指數(PLI)有顯著性差異( P <0.05),其餘牙週指數(GI ,SBI ,PD)無顯著性差異( P>0.05)。結論自鎖託槽與傳統託槽相比,在口腔衛生的維護方麵更有優勢,但二者對患者其他牙週健康的影響無明顯區彆。
목적:비교자쇄탁조여전통탁조대환자아주건강적영향。방법선취12~18세정기환자50례,안교치기류형분위량조:A조,25례대용전통탁조교치적환자;B조,25례대용자쇄탁조교치적환자。분별우치료전화치료중1개월、3개월、6개월시검측량조환자적각항아주지수(G I , PLI ,SBI ,PD)。결과교치전,량조환자각항아주지수무현저성차이( P >0.05);교치과정중,량조환자적균반지수(PLI)유현저성차이( P <0.05),기여아주지수(GI ,SBI ,PD)무현저성차이( P>0.05)。결론자쇄탁조여전통탁조상비,재구강위생적유호방면경유우세,단이자대환자기타아주건강적영향무명현구별。
Objective To compareto impacts of self‐ligating brackets and conventional brackets on the periondontal health of the patient .Methods 50 patients (12 to 18 years old)were divided into 2 groups(group A :25 patients with self‐ligating brackets and group B :25 patients with conventional pre‐adjusted brackets) . Periodontal indices(GI ,PLl ,SBI and PD)were examined in both groups .Results Before treatment ,there is no significant difference between Group A and Group B .During the process of treatment ,PLI is statistical‐ly different between Group A and Group B ,other periodontal indices (GI ,SBI and PD) are not statistically different .Conclusion Although self‐ligating brackets is more beneficial for keeping oral hygiene ,but no significant difference were discovered on the patient’s periodontal health .