四川精神卫生
四川精神衛生
사천정신위생
SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH
2015年
4期
371-373,374
,共4页
化振%杨来启%刘光雄%吴兴曲%马文涛%邓自和%张彦%贾婷
化振%楊來啟%劉光雄%吳興麯%馬文濤%鄧自和%張彥%賈婷
화진%양래계%류광웅%오흥곡%마문도%산자화%장언%가정
新兵%应付方式%自尊%心理健康水平
新兵%應付方式%自尊%心理健康水平
신병%응부방식%자존%심리건강수평
Recruits%Coping styles%Self - esteem%Mental health
目的:分析新兵的应付方式、自尊与心理健康的关系,为促进其心理健康提供理论依据。方法抽取陆军某部队2013夏秋入伍2~3周的421名新兵为研究对象,采用应付方式问卷(CSQ)、自尊量表(SES)、症状自评量表(SCL -90)对其心理应付方式、自尊水平和心理健康状况进行团体施测。结果①独生子女新兵 SES、解决问题因子评分低于非独生子女(t =-2.497,-2.445,P <0.05),SCL -90总评分、自责与退避因子评分高于非独生子女(t =3.353,2.603,2.229,P <0.05);城市新兵 SCL -90总评分高于农村新兵(t =2.291,P <0.05)。②新兵心理健康水平与解决问题、求助、自尊呈正相关(P <0.05),与自责、幻想、退避、合理化呈负相关(P <0.05);对心理健康水平影响大小依次是自责、自尊、幻想、解决问题、合理化因子。③解决问题、合理化、自责、幻想对心理健康产生直接影响(路径系数=-0.14,0.11,0.24,0.21),解决问题、合理化、自责通过自尊中介对心理健康产生间接影响(路径系数=0.35,0.17,0.36)。结论非独生子女与农村新兵心理健康水平较高,应付方式对新兵心理健康产生直接预测作用,自尊是应付方式与心理健康的中间变量。
目的:分析新兵的應付方式、自尊與心理健康的關繫,為促進其心理健康提供理論依據。方法抽取陸軍某部隊2013夏鞦入伍2~3週的421名新兵為研究對象,採用應付方式問捲(CSQ)、自尊量錶(SES)、癥狀自評量錶(SCL -90)對其心理應付方式、自尊水平和心理健康狀況進行糰體施測。結果①獨生子女新兵 SES、解決問題因子評分低于非獨生子女(t =-2.497,-2.445,P <0.05),SCL -90總評分、自責與退避因子評分高于非獨生子女(t =3.353,2.603,2.229,P <0.05);城市新兵 SCL -90總評分高于農村新兵(t =2.291,P <0.05)。②新兵心理健康水平與解決問題、求助、自尊呈正相關(P <0.05),與自責、幻想、退避、閤理化呈負相關(P <0.05);對心理健康水平影響大小依次是自責、自尊、幻想、解決問題、閤理化因子。③解決問題、閤理化、自責、幻想對心理健康產生直接影響(路徑繫數=-0.14,0.11,0.24,0.21),解決問題、閤理化、自責通過自尊中介對心理健康產生間接影響(路徑繫數=0.35,0.17,0.36)。結論非獨生子女與農村新兵心理健康水平較高,應付方式對新兵心理健康產生直接預測作用,自尊是應付方式與心理健康的中間變量。
목적:분석신병적응부방식、자존여심리건강적관계,위촉진기심리건강제공이론의거。방법추취륙군모부대2013하추입오2~3주적421명신병위연구대상,채용응부방식문권(CSQ)、자존량표(SES)、증상자평량표(SCL -90)대기심리응부방식、자존수평화심리건강상황진행단체시측。결과①독생자녀신병 SES、해결문제인자평분저우비독생자녀(t =-2.497,-2.445,P <0.05),SCL -90총평분、자책여퇴피인자평분고우비독생자녀(t =3.353,2.603,2.229,P <0.05);성시신병 SCL -90총평분고우농촌신병(t =2.291,P <0.05)。②신병심리건강수평여해결문제、구조、자존정정상관(P <0.05),여자책、환상、퇴피、합이화정부상관(P <0.05);대심리건강수평영향대소의차시자책、자존、환상、해결문제、합이화인자。③해결문제、합이화、자책、환상대심리건강산생직접영향(로경계수=-0.14,0.11,0.24,0.21),해결문제、합이화、자책통과자존중개대심리건강산생간접영향(로경계수=0.35,0.17,0.36)。결론비독생자녀여농촌신병심리건강수평교고,응부방식대신병심리건강산생직접예측작용,자존시응부방식여심리건강적중간변량。
Objective To analyze the relationship between coping styles,self - esteem and mental health of recruits,to provide a theoretical basis for promoting their mental health. Methods A total of 421 recruits who enlisted in an army troops at the first time in summer and fall of 2013 were included in our study. We used the Coping Style Questionnaire(CSQ),Self - Esteem Scale(SES), and Self Check List(SCL - 90)to evaluate their coping styles,self - esteem,and mental health,respectively. Results ①Compared with the recruits without siblings,recruits with siblings had lower scores in self - esteem and solving problem(t = - 2. 497,- 2. 445, P < 0. 05),and higher scores in total SCL - 90,self - blame and avoidance(t = 3. 353,2. 603,2. 229,P < 0. 05). The total scores of SCL - 90 in the countryside recruits were lower than those in the city recruits(t = 2. 291,P < 0. 05). ②Total score of SCL - 90 and scores of problem - solving,resorting and self - esteem showed positive correlation,and scores of blaming,fantasy,avoidance and rationalization showed negative correlation in coping styles questionnaire with their mental health(P < 0. 05). Self - blame,self -esteem,solving problem,fantasy,and rationalization were the factors of their mental health and those factors were in decreasing order.③Solving problem,rationalization,self - blame and fantasy affected mental health directly(r = - 0. 14,0. 11,0. 24,0. 21),solving problem,rationalization and self - blame affected mental health indirectly by self - esteem(r = 0. 35,0. 17,0. 36). Conclusion The mental health of recruits without siblings and countryside recruits were better. Coping styles could influence mental health directly,and self - esteem was a intermediate indicator between coping styles and mental health.