实用药物与临床
實用藥物與臨床
실용약물여림상
PRACTICAL PHARMACY AND CLINICAL REMEDIES
2015年
8期
920-922
,共3页
路喻清%冯阳阳%李引弟%张向东%杨远东
路喻清%馮暘暘%李引弟%張嚮東%楊遠東
로유청%풍양양%리인제%장향동%양원동
右美托咪定%丙泊酚%剖宫产
右美託咪定%丙泊酚%剖宮產
우미탁미정%병박분%부궁산
Dexmdetomidine%Propofol%Caesarean section
目的:比较右美托咪定及丙泊酚用于剖宫产患者术中镇静的作用。方法选择择期剖宫产患者60例,随机分为2组,每组30例。右美托咪定组在胎儿剖出后即刻注射咪达唑仑1 mg并且泵入右美托咪定1μg/kg,泵注10 min后改为维持量0.6μg/( kg·h);丙泊酚组在胎儿剖出后即刻注射咪达唑仑1 mg并且泵注丙泊酚2 mg/( kg·h)。两组均采用腰硬联合麻醉。记录患者镇静程度OAA/S评分、术中知晓率、呼吸抑制发生率(术中SpO2<94%)、恶心呕吐发生率、寒战不适发生率以及术后镇痛的满意率。结果两组患者术中镇静程度OAA/S评分及知晓率比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05),右美托咪定组术中呼吸抑制发生率、恶心呕吐及寒战不适的发生率明显低于丙泊酚组(P<0.01,P<0.05),且术后镇痛满意率高于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。结论右美托咪定较丙泊酚更适用于剖宫产患者的镇静,可提高患者的舒适度。
目的:比較右美託咪定及丙泊酚用于剖宮產患者術中鎮靜的作用。方法選擇擇期剖宮產患者60例,隨機分為2組,每組30例。右美託咪定組在胎兒剖齣後即刻註射咪達唑崙1 mg併且泵入右美託咪定1μg/kg,泵註10 min後改為維持量0.6μg/( kg·h);丙泊酚組在胎兒剖齣後即刻註射咪達唑崙1 mg併且泵註丙泊酚2 mg/( kg·h)。兩組均採用腰硬聯閤痳醉。記錄患者鎮靜程度OAA/S評分、術中知曉率、呼吸抑製髮生率(術中SpO2<94%)、噁心嘔吐髮生率、寒戰不適髮生率以及術後鎮痛的滿意率。結果兩組患者術中鎮靜程度OAA/S評分及知曉率比較差異無統計學意義( P>0.05),右美託咪定組術中呼吸抑製髮生率、噁心嘔吐及寒戰不適的髮生率明顯低于丙泊酚組(P<0.01,P<0.05),且術後鎮痛滿意率高于丙泊酚組(P<0.05)。結論右美託咪定較丙泊酚更適用于剖宮產患者的鎮靜,可提高患者的舒適度。
목적:비교우미탁미정급병박분용우부궁산환자술중진정적작용。방법선택택기부궁산환자60례,수궤분위2조,매조30례。우미탁미정조재태인부출후즉각주사미체서륜1 mg병차빙입우미탁미정1μg/kg,빙주10 min후개위유지량0.6μg/( kg·h);병박분조재태인부출후즉각주사미체서륜1 mg병차빙주병박분2 mg/( kg·h)。량조균채용요경연합마취。기록환자진정정도OAA/S평분、술중지효솔、호흡억제발생솔(술중SpO2<94%)、악심구토발생솔、한전불괄발생솔이급술후진통적만의솔。결과량조환자술중진정정도OAA/S평분급지효솔비교차이무통계학의의( P>0.05),우미탁미정조술중호흡억제발생솔、악심구토급한전불괄적발생솔명현저우병박분조(P<0.01,P<0.05),차술후진통만의솔고우병박분조(P<0.05)。결론우미탁미정교병박분경괄용우부궁산환자적진정,가제고환자적서괄도。
Objective To compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol as sedatives in patients with cesarean section. Methods Sixty patients undergoing caesarean section were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in dexmedetomidine group (group D,n=30) were immediately injected 1 mg midazolam and pumped 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine after fetal delivery,then the dexmedetomidine was maintained with the amount of 0. 6μg/( kg·h) at 10 min after the first infusion. Patients in propofol group ( group P) received infusion of 1 mg midazo-lam and 2 mg/( kg·h ) propofol after fetal delivery. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia was used in the two groups. The OAA/S score,intraoperative awareness rate,incidences of respiratory depression (SpO2 <94%),nausea/vomiting and chills,the postoperative sedative satisfactory rate were recorded. Results There was no significant differ-ence in OAA/S score and intraoperative awareness rate between the two groups (P>0. 05). The incidences of intraop-erative respiratory inhibition,nausea/vomiting and chills in group D were lower than those of group P (P<0. 05). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine has better sedative effect on patients with caesarean operation than that of propofol and can improve the patients′ comfort level.