临床肿瘤学杂志
臨床腫瘤學雜誌
림상종류학잡지
CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2015年
8期
722-725
,共4页
原凌燕%柳珂%王湛%娄成%钱建新%王杰军
原凌燕%柳珂%王湛%婁成%錢建新%王傑軍
원릉연%류가%왕담%루성%전건신%왕걸군
肿瘤%羟考酮控释片%癌性疼痛%滴定
腫瘤%羥攷酮控釋片%癌性疼痛%滴定
종류%간고동공석편%암성동통%적정
Tumor%Oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets%Cancer pain%Titration
目的:评价羟考酮控释片在中重度癌痛滴定中的有效性和安全性。方法81例既往未接受阿片类药物治疗的中重度癌痛(疼痛评分>3)患者随机分成2组:A组(42例)接受吗啡即释片10 mg q4 h滴定;B组(39例)接受羟考酮控释片10 mg q12 h为背景止痛药的滴定。后按照NCCN疼痛治疗指南的要求滴定,24 h后2组均根据吗啡使用总量调整羟考酮控释片用量。观察期为24 h,服药后1 h开始根据疼痛数字评价量表( NRS)进行评分,比较两组疗效和不良反应的发生率。结果24 h观察期内吗啡即释片组的疼痛缓解率为82?9%,羟考酮控释片组为87?2%;滴定4 h,吗啡即释片组的疼痛缓解率为58?3%,羟考酮控释片组为77?0%,两组差异有统计学意义( P<0?05);滴定12 h,两组疼痛缓解率接近,差异无统计学意义( P>0?05)。两组患者主要不良反应为便秘、恶心呕吐、头晕、口干、嗜睡、尿潴留,经过对症处理均可耐受。结论羟考酮控释片作为止痛背景用药在中重度癌痛滴定中与吗啡即释片的疗效及安全性相当,但止痛治疗的稳定性更佳。
目的:評價羥攷酮控釋片在中重度癌痛滴定中的有效性和安全性。方法81例既往未接受阿片類藥物治療的中重度癌痛(疼痛評分>3)患者隨機分成2組:A組(42例)接受嗎啡即釋片10 mg q4 h滴定;B組(39例)接受羥攷酮控釋片10 mg q12 h為揹景止痛藥的滴定。後按照NCCN疼痛治療指南的要求滴定,24 h後2組均根據嗎啡使用總量調整羥攷酮控釋片用量。觀察期為24 h,服藥後1 h開始根據疼痛數字評價量錶( NRS)進行評分,比較兩組療效和不良反應的髮生率。結果24 h觀察期內嗎啡即釋片組的疼痛緩解率為82?9%,羥攷酮控釋片組為87?2%;滴定4 h,嗎啡即釋片組的疼痛緩解率為58?3%,羥攷酮控釋片組為77?0%,兩組差異有統計學意義( P<0?05);滴定12 h,兩組疼痛緩解率接近,差異無統計學意義( P>0?05)。兩組患者主要不良反應為便祕、噁心嘔吐、頭暈、口榦、嗜睡、尿潴留,經過對癥處理均可耐受。結論羥攷酮控釋片作為止痛揹景用藥在中重度癌痛滴定中與嗎啡即釋片的療效及安全性相噹,但止痛治療的穩定性更佳。
목적:평개간고동공석편재중중도암통적정중적유효성화안전성。방법81례기왕미접수아편류약물치료적중중도암통(동통평분>3)환자수궤분성2조:A조(42례)접수마배즉석편10 mg q4 h적정;B조(39례)접수간고동공석편10 mg q12 h위배경지통약적적정。후안조NCCN동통치료지남적요구적정,24 h후2조균근거마배사용총량조정간고동공석편용량。관찰기위24 h,복약후1 h개시근거동통수자평개량표( NRS)진행평분,비교량조료효화불량반응적발생솔。결과24 h관찰기내마배즉석편조적동통완해솔위82?9%,간고동공석편조위87?2%;적정4 h,마배즉석편조적동통완해솔위58?3%,간고동공석편조위77?0%,량조차이유통계학의의( P<0?05);적정12 h,량조동통완해솔접근,차이무통계학의의( P>0?05)。량조환자주요불량반응위편비、악심구토、두훈、구간、기수、뇨저류,경과대증처리균가내수。결론간고동공석편작위지통배경용약재중중도암통적정중여마배즉석편적료효급안전성상당,단지통치료적은정성경가。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxycodone hydrochloride controlled?release tablets in titration of moderate or severe caner pain for background. Methods Eighty?one patients suffering from moderate or severe cancer pain without his?tory of opioid were divided into two groups: Group A(42 cases) used short?acting morphine tablets 10 mg per 4 h to start titration;Group B( 39 cases) used oxycodone hydrochloride controlled?release tablets 10 mg per12 h as background, then patients received titra?tion following NCCN pain’ s guide. After 24 h total opioid dose and translation to oxycodone hydrochloride controlled?release tablets at last were calculated and cumulated. Meanwhile, the efficacy and safety of two groups within 24 hours observation period were compared. Results The total efficiency was 82?9% in group A and 87?2% in group B. Four hours after titrating, pain relieving objective re?sponse rate of group A decreased sharply into 58?3% while group B up to 77?0% with statistically significant differences(P<0?05). Twelve hours after titrating, the pain relieving objective response rates were similar in two groups, and the difference was no statistically significance(P>0?05). The main adverse reactions of two groups were including constipation, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, dry mouth, drowsiness and dysuria, which could be relieved by symptomatic treatment. Conclusion Oxycodone hydrochloride controlled?release tablets are effective and safty in relieving moderate or severe cancer pain steady in titration as background.