CAJ | 학술논문

“萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说(Sapir–wharf Hypothesis)”，分为强式与弱式两种版本，是关于语言与思维关系的重要理论，认为语言只是在一定程度上影响思维，并不起制约或主导作用。从“内容与形式”的哲学角度，论述“假说”强式版本的不当之处，支持“假说”的弱势版本，并从英汉语语言的差异中对比总结，探寻这些语言差异带给两种语言使用者思维上的不同，从而进一步深化语言对思维影响的论断。
“살비이-옥이부가설(Sapir–wharf Hypothesis)”，분위강식여약식량충판본，시관우어언여사유관계적중요이론，인위어언지시재일정정도상영향사유，병불기제약혹주도작용。종“내용여형식”적철학각도，논술“가설”강식판본적불당지처，지지“가설”적약세판본，병종영한어어언적차이중대비총결，탐심저사어언차이대급량충어언사용자사유상적불동，종이진일보심화어언대사유영향적론단。
"Sapir-Wolf hypothesis", which is divided into strong version and weak version , an important theory about the relation be-tween language and thinking that language has an influence on thinking to a certain extent, but language does not restrict or play a leading role in thinking .The inappropriate point of the strong version of the"Hypothesis"is to be analyzed from the perspective of"content and form"and the weak version of"Hypothesis"is supported and differences between English and Chinese language are compared and sum-marized and different thinking of the two language users because of these differences in language is explored so as to further deepen the conclusion that language has an influence on thinking.