成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）
成都理工大學學報（社會科學版）
성도리공대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2015年
5期
78-83
,共6页
原因自由行为%醉酒犯罪%立法模式%无责任能力%限制责任能力
原因自由行為%醉酒犯罪%立法模式%無責任能力%限製責任能力
원인자유행위%취주범죄%입법모식%무책임능력%한제책임능력
actio libera in causa%intoxication%legislative mode%incapacity for criminal responsibility%limited capacity for criminal responsibility
通说认为，中国大陆刑法对原因自由行为理论仅在刑法第18条第4款上涉及。立法上，该条款不分情况的“一刀切”模式不符合法理和情理。立法的不完善直接导致司法实践中出现错误的处理思路，司法实务人员倾向于直接引用该条款追究行为人的完全刑事责任。以醉酒犯罪为切入口来探讨原因自由行为，重点针对司法实践中亟待解决的关键问题，借鉴域外关于自陷行为之立法例，探讨我国立法之困境，对其进行反思与完善，得出既适用于一般又考虑个别的“总则加分则”的立法模式。
通說認為，中國大陸刑法對原因自由行為理論僅在刑法第18條第4款上涉及。立法上，該條款不分情況的“一刀切”模式不符閤法理和情理。立法的不完善直接導緻司法實踐中齣現錯誤的處理思路，司法實務人員傾嚮于直接引用該條款追究行為人的完全刑事責任。以醉酒犯罪為切入口來探討原因自由行為，重點針對司法實踐中亟待解決的關鍵問題，藉鑒域外關于自陷行為之立法例，探討我國立法之睏境，對其進行反思與完善，得齣既適用于一般又攷慮箇彆的“總則加分則”的立法模式。
통설인위，중국대륙형법대원인자유행위이론부재형법제18조제4관상섭급。입법상，해조관불분정황적“일도절”모식불부합법리화정리。입법적불완선직접도치사법실천중출현착오적처리사로，사법실무인원경향우직접인용해조관추구행위인적완전형사책임。이취주범죄위절입구래탐토원인자유행위，중점침대사법실천중극대해결적관건문제，차감역외관우자함행위지입법례，탐토아국입법지곤경，대기진행반사여완선，득출기괄용우일반우고필개별적“총칙가분칙”적입법모식。
Commonly believed that criminal law only involves the theory of actio libera in causa on The fourth paragraph of article eighteenth.The terms regardless of the case of “one size fits all”mode in legislation,which is not in line with legal and reasonable.Imperfection of the legislation led directly to the treatment of errors in judicial practice,judicial personnel tend to refere to the terms directly to account for complete criminal responsibility.States tend to study Actio libera in causa beginning with drunk crime,so does this paper.This article focuses on urgent problem in judicial practice ,discuss the dilemma,give reflections and suggestions of Chinese legislation referring to extraterritorial.It obtains that the mode of “General Provisions add to Specific Provisions”,which both applies generally and considers individually ,is the best selection for legislation that complies with the legal order and fits for legislative concept of contemporary China.
