临床与病理杂志
臨床與病理雜誌
림상여병리잡지
International Journal of Pathology and Clinical Medicine
2015年
8期
1537-1541
,共5页
戎国栋%徐婷%赵鸿%张洁心%王芳%潘世扬%黄珮珺%陈丹
戎國棟%徐婷%趙鴻%張潔心%王芳%潘世颺%黃珮珺%陳丹
융국동%서정%조홍%장길심%왕방%반세양%황패군%진단
HBV DNA%定量%慢性乙型肝炎%HBeAg
HBV DNA%定量%慢性乙型肝炎%HBeAg
HBV DNA%정량%만성을형간염%HBeAg
HBV DNA%quantifcation%chronic hepatitis B%HBeAg
目的:比较超敏HBV DNA检测系统与传统荧光定量PCR外标法定量检测血清乙肝病毒DNA,探讨其临床应用价值。方法:采用超敏PCR检测系统和传统荧光定量PCR外标法同时检测80例HBsAg阳性患者的血清HBV DNA浓度。结果:超敏法阳性检出率(92.5%)高于传统外标法(50.0%)(P<0.01)。超敏法阳性定量结果中位值为2.95×105 IU/mL,高于传统外标法(5.63×104 IU/mL)(P<0.01),两种方法对高载量病毒(≥104 IU/mL)血清标本检测结果的相关性有统计学意义(R2=0.89,P<0.01)。超敏法对26例HBeAg阴性慢性乙肝患者的阳性检出率(100.0%)高于传统外标法(11.5%)(P<0.01)。结论:超敏HBV DNA定量检测系统检测灵敏度高,更适用于临床低载量病毒(<104 IU/mL)血清标本的检测。
目的:比較超敏HBV DNA檢測繫統與傳統熒光定量PCR外標法定量檢測血清乙肝病毒DNA,探討其臨床應用價值。方法:採用超敏PCR檢測繫統和傳統熒光定量PCR外標法同時檢測80例HBsAg暘性患者的血清HBV DNA濃度。結果:超敏法暘性檢齣率(92.5%)高于傳統外標法(50.0%)(P<0.01)。超敏法暘性定量結果中位值為2.95×105 IU/mL,高于傳統外標法(5.63×104 IU/mL)(P<0.01),兩種方法對高載量病毒(≥104 IU/mL)血清標本檢測結果的相關性有統計學意義(R2=0.89,P<0.01)。超敏法對26例HBeAg陰性慢性乙肝患者的暘性檢齣率(100.0%)高于傳統外標法(11.5%)(P<0.01)。結論:超敏HBV DNA定量檢測繫統檢測靈敏度高,更適用于臨床低載量病毒(<104 IU/mL)血清標本的檢測。
목적:비교초민HBV DNA검측계통여전통형광정량PCR외표법정량검측혈청을간병독DNA,탐토기림상응용개치。방법:채용초민PCR검측계통화전통형광정량PCR외표법동시검측80례HBsAg양성환자적혈청HBV DNA농도。결과:초민법양성검출솔(92.5%)고우전통외표법(50.0%)(P<0.01)。초민법양성정량결과중위치위2.95×105 IU/mL,고우전통외표법(5.63×104 IU/mL)(P<0.01),량충방법대고재량병독(≥104 IU/mL)혈청표본검측결과적상관성유통계학의의(R2=0.89,P<0.01)。초민법대26례HBeAg음성만성을간환자적양성검출솔(100.0%)고우전통외표법(11.5%)(P<0.01)。결론:초민HBV DNA정량검측계통검측령민도고,경괄용우림상저재량병독(<104 IU/mL)혈청표본적검측。
Objective: To compare a highly sensitive detection system with a traditional real-time PCR assay with external standards for HBV DNA quantiifcation.Methods: hTe concentrations of serum HBV DNA in 80 HBsAg-positive patients were determined by both a highly sensitive detection system and a traditional real-time PCR assay with external standards. Results: hTe positive rate determined by the highly sensitive system (92.5%) was signiifcantly higher than that by the traditional assay (50.0%) (P<0.01). The median HBV DNA concentration quantified by the highly sensitive system was 2.95×105 IU/mL, which was signiifcantly higher than that by the traditional assay (5.63×104 IU/mL) (P<0.01). hTere was a high correlation between HBV DNA concentrations (≥104 IU/mL) determined by the two different assays (R2=0.89,P<0.01). hTe positive rate of 26 HBeAg-negative patients determined by highly sensitive system (100.0%) was signiifcantly higher than that by traditional assay (11.5%) (P<0.01).Conclusion: hTe highly sensitive system is more suitable for HBV DNA quantiifcation of clinical serum samples with low virus load (<104 IU/mL).