CAJ | 학술논문

威廉斯认为革命是真实情景中复杂的、整体的行动。对于真实的革命行动，简单的反应是不够的，容易陷入“既有悲剧意识形态”的窠臼，从而建立一套逃避革命的保护机制。从悲剧性的角度理解革命，实际就是要在悲剧性感受、认识与行动之间建立有效的联动机制，以积极的姿态直面悲剧、认识悲剧用真实的行动否定悲剧。与马克思、恩格斯的经典论述相比，威廉斯关于革命悲剧的论述明显修改、扩充了革命悲剧的内涵与外延，但也存在一些值得商榷的地方。
위렴사인위혁명시진실정경중복잡적、정체적행동。대우진실적혁명행동，간단적반응시불구적，용역함입“기유비극의식형태”적과구，종이건립일투도피혁명적보호궤제。종비극성적각도리해혁명，실제취시요재비극성감수、인식여행동지간건립유효적련동궤제，이적겁적자태직면비극、인식비극용진실적행동부정비극。여마극사、은격사적경전논술상비，위렴사관우혁명비극적논술명현수개、확충료혁명비극적내함여외연，단야존재일사치득상각적지방。
To Williams, revolution is a complicated, holistic behavior in real situations. To real revolu-tionary acts, only responses are not enough. For they are easy to fall into the pattern of ”existing tragedy ideology”. To avoid this, a protection mechanism must be established to escape the revolution. To un-derstand the revolution from the tragic point of view is in fact to establish an effective linkage mechanism between the tragic experience, understanding and action, and to take a positive attitude to face the tragedy, recognize the tragedy and negate the tragedy in real actions. Compared with the classical discourse of Marx and Engels, Williams’ exposition of the revolutionary tragedy has been significantly modified and expanded in the connotation and extension of the revolutionary tragedy, but there are some areas deserving further discussion.