武汉体育学院学报
武漢體育學院學報
무한체육학원학보
JOURNAL OF WUHAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION
2015年
8期
57-63
,共7页
社会比较%自我损耗%自主选择%调节作用
社會比較%自我損耗%自主選擇%調節作用
사회비교%자아손모%자주선택%조절작용
social comparison%self-consuming%self-selection%moderate effect
检验社会比较是否使运动员产生自我损耗以及自主选择在社会比较与运动员自我损耗关系间的调节作用。40名大学生运动员(男:38名,女:2名,年龄为19.900士1.148)参与该研究,实验采用2×2两因素组间设计,参与者首先分别完成5分钟不同自主选择的社会比较任务,然后完成Stroop任务测试。结果发现,社会比较与控制组在Stroop任务不一致错误数上差异显著,F(1,36)=7.565, p=0.009,η2=0.174,该结果表明,社会比较使运动员产生自我损耗;在控制选择条件下,社会比较与控制组在Stroop任务不一致错误数差异显著,F(1,18)=9.789, p=.006,η2=.352,而在自主选择条件下,不同社会比较组在Stroop各项任务成绩上差异不显著,F(4,15)=2.834, p=0.062,η2=0.430,该结果表明,自主选择在社会比较与运动员自我损耗关系间起调节作用。该研究提示,运动员面临社会比较情境时,应给予他们自主权,而不是强迫他们去面对社会比较,这样可避免消耗更多的自我控制能量以利于后续比赛或训练。
檢驗社會比較是否使運動員產生自我損耗以及自主選擇在社會比較與運動員自我損耗關繫間的調節作用。40名大學生運動員(男:38名,女:2名,年齡為19.900士1.148)參與該研究,實驗採用2×2兩因素組間設計,參與者首先分彆完成5分鐘不同自主選擇的社會比較任務,然後完成Stroop任務測試。結果髮現,社會比較與控製組在Stroop任務不一緻錯誤數上差異顯著,F(1,36)=7.565, p=0.009,η2=0.174,該結果錶明,社會比較使運動員產生自我損耗;在控製選擇條件下,社會比較與控製組在Stroop任務不一緻錯誤數差異顯著,F(1,18)=9.789, p=.006,η2=.352,而在自主選擇條件下,不同社會比較組在Stroop各項任務成績上差異不顯著,F(4,15)=2.834, p=0.062,η2=0.430,該結果錶明,自主選擇在社會比較與運動員自我損耗關繫間起調節作用。該研究提示,運動員麵臨社會比較情境時,應給予他們自主權,而不是彊迫他們去麵對社會比較,這樣可避免消耗更多的自我控製能量以利于後續比賽或訓練。
검험사회비교시부사운동원산생자아손모이급자주선택재사회비교여운동원자아손모관계간적조절작용。40명대학생운동원(남:38명,녀:2명,년령위19.900사1.148)삼여해연구,실험채용2×2량인소조간설계,삼여자수선분별완성5분종불동자주선택적사회비교임무,연후완성Stroop임무측시。결과발현,사회비교여공제조재Stroop임무불일치착오수상차이현저,F(1,36)=7.565, p=0.009,η2=0.174,해결과표명,사회비교사운동원산생자아손모;재공제선택조건하,사회비교여공제조재Stroop임무불일치착오수차이현저,F(1,18)=9.789, p=.006,η2=.352,이재자주선택조건하,불동사회비교조재Stroop각항임무성적상차이불현저,F(4,15)=2.834, p=0.062,η2=0.430,해결과표명,자주선택재사회비교여운동원자아손모관계간기조절작용。해연구제시,운동원면림사회비교정경시,응급여타문자주권,이불시강박타문거면대사회비교,저양가피면소모경다적자아공제능량이리우후속비새혹훈련。
This research was designed to test whether or not society could make the athletes self‐consuming and self‐selec‐tion could take moderate effect to handle the relationship between the society comparison and athletes'self‐consuming .40 college athletes (male:38 ,female:2 ,with a age 19 .900 ± 1 .148) participated this research ,and the research adopted two‐factors between 2 × 2 block design .The participants completed the tasks of social comparison of different self‐selec‐tions in five minutes separately at first ,and then performed a task ,and then complete the test of Stroop task .The result showed that the differences between the group of social comparison and control group in non‐match mistaken numbers of Stroop task are apparently ,F(1 ,18)=9 .789 ,p= .006 ,η2 =0 .352 .Meanwhile ,under the condition of self‐selection ,the differences between different groups of social comparison in Stroop respective task are not apparently ,F(4 ,15)=2 .834 , p=0 .062 ,η2 =0 .430 .This means self‐selection could take moderate effect to handle the relationship between the society comparison and athletes'self‐consuming .When the athletes were faced with the circumstance of society comparison ,we should not force them to face it ,but give them autonomy .In such a way could the athletes avoid consume too much energy of self‐control to compete or train better .