齐齐哈尔医学院学报
齊齊哈爾醫學院學報
제제합이의학원학보
JOURNAL OF QIQIHAR MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
24期
3616-3618
,共3页
张晓丽%邓婵娥%陈宇%王福生
張曉麗%鄧嬋娥%陳宇%王福生
장효려%산선아%진우%왕복생
中心静脉导管引流%尿激酶%结核性包裹性胸腔积液%临床效果
中心靜脈導管引流%尿激酶%結覈性包裹性胸腔積液%臨床效果
중심정맥도관인류%뇨격매%결핵성포과성흉강적액%림상효과
Central venous catheter%Urokinase%Encapsulated pleural effusion%Clinical effect
目的:探讨中心静脉导管引流加尿激酶胸腔内注射治疗结核性包裹性胸腔积液临床效果,以期寻找最佳方法,提高临床水平。方法选取2011年2月至2014年10月96例结核性包裹性胸腔积液患者为研究对象,分成两组,对照组48例,予常规方法治疗,观察组48例,中心静脉导管引流加尿激酶胸腔内注射治疗,观察治疗后相关指标变化情况。结果疗效上,对照组显效率31.25%、总有效率77.08%,观察组显效率47.92%、总有效率89.59%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组在胸腔积液引流量、住院时间、胸水消失时间、胸膜肥厚发生率、气血胸等不良反应发生率比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);两组治疗后在自觉症状、心理情绪、躯体生理功能、日常生活、社会活动等生存质量上比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中心静脉导管引流加尿激酶胸腔内注射治疗结核性包裹性胸腔积液临床效果显著。
目的:探討中心靜脈導管引流加尿激酶胸腔內註射治療結覈性包裹性胸腔積液臨床效果,以期尋找最佳方法,提高臨床水平。方法選取2011年2月至2014年10月96例結覈性包裹性胸腔積液患者為研究對象,分成兩組,對照組48例,予常規方法治療,觀察組48例,中心靜脈導管引流加尿激酶胸腔內註射治療,觀察治療後相關指標變化情況。結果療效上,對照組顯效率31.25%、總有效率77.08%,觀察組顯效率47.92%、總有效率89.59%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組在胸腔積液引流量、住院時間、胸水消失時間、胸膜肥厚髮生率、氣血胸等不良反應髮生率比較差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);兩組治療後在自覺癥狀、心理情緒、軀體生理功能、日常生活、社會活動等生存質量上比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論中心靜脈導管引流加尿激酶胸腔內註射治療結覈性包裹性胸腔積液臨床效果顯著。
목적:탐토중심정맥도관인류가뇨격매흉강내주사치료결핵성포과성흉강적액림상효과,이기심조최가방법,제고림상수평。방법선취2011년2월지2014년10월96례결핵성포과성흉강적액환자위연구대상,분성량조,대조조48례,여상규방법치료,관찰조48례,중심정맥도관인류가뇨격매흉강내주사치료,관찰치료후상관지표변화정황。결과료효상,대조조현효솔31.25%、총유효솔77.08%,관찰조현효솔47.92%、총유효솔89.59%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조재흉강적액인류량、주원시간、흉수소실시간、흉막비후발생솔、기혈흉등불량반응발생솔비교차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);량조치료후재자각증상、심리정서、구체생리공능、일상생활、사회활동등생존질량상비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론중심정맥도관인류가뇨격매흉강내주사치료결핵성포과성흉강적액림상효과현저。
Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of encapsulated pleural effusion with the central venous catheter drainage and intrapleural urokinase in order to find the best way to improve the clinical outcome. Methods From February 2011 to October 2014, 96 patients with encapsulated pleural effusion were divided into two groups.48 patients in control group were treated with conventional methods, and 48 cases in observation group were treated by central venous catheter drainage and intrapleural urokinase.Results In the control group, the markedly effective rate was 31.25% and the total effective rate was 77.08%.In the observation group, markedly effective rate was 47.92% and the total effective rate was 89.59%.There were statistical differences between these two groups (P<0.05) in the incidence of adverse reaction, such as the Pleural effusion drainage, the hospitalization time , the hydrothorax disappearance time , the incidence of pleural thickening and pneumohemothorax.After treatment, there were significant differences (P<0.05) between two groups in the comparison of survival quality, such as symptoms, psychological and emotional distress, physiological function,daily life and social activities.The curative effect, incidence of adverse reaction and survival quality of the observation group were better than those of the control group.Conclusions The central venous catheter drainage and intrapleural urokinase for encapsulated pleural effusion are markedly effective.