中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
22期
60-62
,共3页
股骨粗隆间骨折%PFNA%DHS
股骨粗隆間骨摺%PFNA%DHS
고골조륭간골절%PFNA%DHS
Femoral intertrochanteric fracture%PFNA%DHS
目的:对防旋转股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效进行分析。方法将我院2013年1月~2014年8月收治的144例股骨粗隆间骨折患者随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组72例患者行动力髋螺钉(DHS)内固定,观察组72例患者行PFNA内固定,对比两组患者的手术指标、治疗效果及术后并发症的发生率。结果观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间、负重时间及骨折愈合时间显著短于对照组,术中出血量明显少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者手术后的髋关节Harris评分为(90.8±6.2)分,对照组为(81.5±7.2)分,观察组术后的髋关节Harris评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的治疗优良率为97.22%,对照组为76.39%,观察组患者的治疗优良率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的并发症发生率为4.17%,对照组为13.89%,观察组患者的并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对股骨粗隆间骨折患者采用PFNA内固定治疗具有创伤小、效果理想、安全性高等优点,值得临床上推广应用。
目的:對防鏇轉股骨近耑髓內釘(PFNA)治療股骨粗隆間骨摺的療效進行分析。方法將我院2013年1月~2014年8月收治的144例股骨粗隆間骨摺患者隨機分為對照組和觀察組,對照組72例患者行動力髖螺釘(DHS)內固定,觀察組72例患者行PFNA內固定,對比兩組患者的手術指標、治療效果及術後併髮癥的髮生率。結果觀察組患者的手術時間、住院時間、負重時間及骨摺愈閤時間顯著短于對照組,術中齣血量明顯少于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組患者手術後的髖關節Harris評分為(90.8±6.2)分,對照組為(81.5±7.2)分,觀察組術後的髖關節Harris評分明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組患者的治療優良率為97.22%,對照組為76.39%,觀察組患者的治療優良率明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組患者的併髮癥髮生率為4.17%,對照組為13.89%,觀察組患者的併髮癥髮生率明顯低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對股骨粗隆間骨摺患者採用PFNA內固定治療具有創傷小、效果理想、安全性高等優點,值得臨床上推廣應用。
목적:대방선전고골근단수내정(PFNA)치료고골조륭간골절적료효진행분석。방법장아원2013년1월~2014년8월수치적144례고골조륭간골절환자수궤분위대조조화관찰조,대조조72례환자행동력관라정(DHS)내고정,관찰조72례환자행PFNA내고정,대비량조환자적수술지표、치료효과급술후병발증적발생솔。결과관찰조환자적수술시간、주원시간、부중시간급골절유합시간현저단우대조조,술중출혈량명현소우대조조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조환자수술후적관관절Harris평분위(90.8±6.2)분,대조조위(81.5±7.2)분,관찰조술후적관관절Harris평분명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조환자적치료우량솔위97.22%,대조조위76.39%,관찰조환자적치료우량솔명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조환자적병발증발생솔위4.17%,대조조위13.89%,관찰조환자적병발증발생솔명현저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대고골조륭간골절환자채용PFNA내고정치료구유창상소、효과이상、안전성고등우점,치득림상상추엄응용。
Objective To analyze and discuss the efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods A total of 144 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2014 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 72 patients in each group. The control group was given dynamic hip screw (DHS) internal fixation and the obser-vation group was given PFNA internal fixation. The surgical indicators, treatment effects and incidences of postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Results The observation group was significantly shorter than the control group in the surgical time, length of hospital stay, weight bearing time and fracture healing time, and was significantly less than the control group in the intraoperative bleeding amount, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The postoperative hip joint Harris score of the observation group was (90.8±6.2) points and that of the control group was (81.5±7.2) points; the observation group was significantly higher than the control group in the hip joint Harris score, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). The treatment effective rate of the observation group was 97.22% and that of the control group was 76.39%;the observation group was significantly higher than the control group in the treat-ment effective rate, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). The incidence of complications of the observation group was 4.17%and that of the control group was 13.89%;the observation group was significantly lower than the con-trol group in the incidence of complications, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusion In the treat-ment of patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, the application of PFNA internal fixation has the advantages of small trauma, ideal effects and high safety, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.