CAJ | 학술논문

对于《刑法》第一百三十三条之一的危险驾驶罪主观罪过认定，一些学者基于各自的理解，构建了相应理论，但均无法自圆其说。笔者以《刑法》第十四、十五条为切入点，指出争议的根本症结是对主观罪过理论的不同理解；争议的实质是违背《刑法》总则精神来构建理论；认定的难点是该罪罪过处于间接故意与过于自信过失之间的游离状态。鉴于该罪罪过之性状，可行之路径是切实恪守罪过形式的“一元性”原则，以危害结果为考量点，并结合所掌握的证据进行具体分析。唯此，才能既贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策，也能彰显人权保障的精神。
대우《형법》제일백삼십삼조지일적위험가사죄주관죄과인정，일사학자기우각자적리해，구건료상응이론，단균무법자원기설。필자이《형법》제십사、십오조위절입점，지출쟁의적근본증결시대주관죄과이론적불동리해；쟁의적실질시위배《형법》총칙정신래구건이론；인정적난점시해죄죄과처우간접고의여과우자신과실지간적유리상태。감우해죄죄과지성상，가행지로경시절실각수죄과형식적“일원성”원칙，이위해결과위고량점，병결합소장악적증거진행구체분석。유차，재능기관철관엄상제적형사정책，야능창현인권보장적정신。
Many researchers have constructed corresponding theories based on their own un-derstanding on the subjective crime of dangerous driving in the 133rd article of criminal law;however all of which are unable to be justified.The author takes the 14th and 15th articles of the criminal law as the starting point,noting that the fundamental crux of the dispute lies in differ-ent understandings of the theory of subj ective crime.The essence of the dispute is the construc-tion of theory contrary to the general principles of the criminal law;the difficulty of crime deter-mination is due to the free state of the crime between indirect intentional faults and self-confi-dence fault.Given the characteristics of the crime,the feasible path is to strictly follow the sole principle of crime forms,take the result of the crime into consideration,and analyze the specific case based on proofs.Only in this way can we implement the criminal policy of combining punish-ment with leniency,but also guarantee human rights.