浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)
浙江大學學報(農業與生命科學版)
절강대학학보(농업여생명과학판)
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY(AGRICULTURE & LIFE SCIENCES)
2015年
4期
439-448
,共10页
韦克苏%胡婷婷%李德仑%涂永高%于良骥%涂光军
韋剋囌%鬍婷婷%李德崙%塗永高%于良驥%塗光軍
위극소%호정정%리덕륜%도영고%우량기%도광군
烤烟%有效微生物群%土壤改良剂%农艺性状%品质
烤煙%有效微生物群%土壤改良劑%農藝性狀%品質
고연%유효미생물군%토양개량제%농예성상%품질
flue-cured tobacco%effective microorganisms%soil amendment%agronomic characteristic%quality
为研究有效微生物群( effective microorganisms ,EM )和土壤改良剂混施在烤烟生产上的效果,采用田间随机区组试验调查了混施EM菌和土壤改良剂对烤烟大田期农艺性状及烟叶产量和质量的影响.结果表明:混施EM菌和土壤改良剂可促进烟株田间长势,在烤烟成熟期表现尤为明显;在常规地膜移栽和井窖式移栽模式下,混施EM菌和土壤改良剂可提高烟叶产量并优化其等级结构,其中,产量分别达到1909.31 kg/hm2和2134.91 kg/hm2,较对照分别提高5.21%和7.13%,产值分别达到29460.69元/hm2和35162.05元/hm2,除去EM 菌和土壤改良剂施用成本后,产值较对照分别提高3.84%和8.72%;在化学成分方面,混施EM菌和土壤改良剂可提高初烤烟叶烟碱、钾和氯含量,降低总糖含量、施木克值和糖碱比,提高两糖比(还原糖/总糖),降低两糖差值;混施EM菌和土壤改良剂可提高烟叶评吸质量,评吸总得分分别提高2.30和2.67.综上所述,混施 EM 菌和土壤改良剂在优化烟叶等级结构、提高烟叶产质量上具有实用价值.
為研究有效微生物群( effective microorganisms ,EM )和土壤改良劑混施在烤煙生產上的效果,採用田間隨機區組試驗調查瞭混施EM菌和土壤改良劑對烤煙大田期農藝性狀及煙葉產量和質量的影響.結果錶明:混施EM菌和土壤改良劑可促進煙株田間長勢,在烤煙成熟期錶現尤為明顯;在常規地膜移栽和井窖式移栽模式下,混施EM菌和土壤改良劑可提高煙葉產量併優化其等級結構,其中,產量分彆達到1909.31 kg/hm2和2134.91 kg/hm2,較對照分彆提高5.21%和7.13%,產值分彆達到29460.69元/hm2和35162.05元/hm2,除去EM 菌和土壤改良劑施用成本後,產值較對照分彆提高3.84%和8.72%;在化學成分方麵,混施EM菌和土壤改良劑可提高初烤煙葉煙堿、鉀和氯含量,降低總糖含量、施木剋值和糖堿比,提高兩糖比(還原糖/總糖),降低兩糖差值;混施EM菌和土壤改良劑可提高煙葉評吸質量,評吸總得分分彆提高2.30和2.67.綜上所述,混施 EM 菌和土壤改良劑在優化煙葉等級結構、提高煙葉產質量上具有實用價值.
위연구유효미생물군( effective microorganisms ,EM )화토양개량제혼시재고연생산상적효과,채용전간수궤구조시험조사료혼시EM균화토양개량제대고연대전기농예성상급연협산량화질량적영향.결과표명:혼시EM균화토양개량제가촉진연주전간장세,재고연성숙기표현우위명현;재상규지막이재화정교식이재모식하,혼시EM균화토양개량제가제고연협산량병우화기등급결구,기중,산량분별체도1909.31 kg/hm2화2134.91 kg/hm2,교대조분별제고5.21%화7.13%,산치분별체도29460.69원/hm2화35162.05원/hm2,제거EM 균화토양개량제시용성본후,산치교대조분별제고3.84%화8.72%;재화학성분방면,혼시EM균화토양개량제가제고초고연협연감、갑화록함량,강저총당함량、시목극치화당감비,제고량당비(환원당/총당),강저량당차치;혼시EM균화토양개량제가제고연협평흡질량,평흡총득분분별제고2.30화2.67.종상소술,혼시 EM 균화토양개량제재우화연협등급결구、제고연협산질량상구유실용개치.
Summary Flue‐cured tobacco is a major cash crop in China . Due to the scarcity of land resources , continuous cropping of tobacco was very common all over the country . However , the continuous cropping phenomenon would lead to change of soil properties and nutrient imbalance , seriously affecting yield and economic merits of tobacco . Therefore , it was quite necessary to optimize the soil microbial environment and promote the effective absorption and utilization of fertilizers , to improve the yield and quality of flue‐cured tobacco . It has been reported that soil amendments could improve the physical and chemical properties of soil , as well as the nutrient status , which could also regulate pH and organic matter of soil to increase the availability of N , P and K contents . In a word , soil amendments were effective to promote the productivity of degraded soils . Microbial fertilizer could improve the micro‐environment of plant rhizosphere , by increasing the diversity of microbial species and improving grow th and nutrient absorption capacity of root .
<br> There have been many reports about the effect of microbial fertilizer or soil amendment application on growth and development of crops , but the mixed application effect of microbial fertilizer and soil amendments was rarely mentioned . In this study , the combining effects of effective microorganisms ( EM ) and soil amendments on agronomic characteristic and quality of flue‐cured tobacco were investigated .
<br> A field trial designed as randomized block was carried out to reveal the effects of EM and soil amendment treatments ( T1 :conventional film transplanting ;T2 :conventional film transplanting + EM + soil amendments ;T3 :well cellar type transplanting ;T4 :well cellar type transplanting + EM + soil amendments) on leaves , root and stem development of flue‐cured tobacco during the growth period . Meanwhile , the effects of different treatments on yield and quality of flue‐cured tobacco were discussed .
<br> The results showed that the mixed application of EM and soil amendments promoted the growth of tobacco plant , especially at the maturity stage . Simultaneously , the mixed application of EM and soil amendments also improved the yield and quality of tobacco leaves , and optimized the grade of tobacco leaves . The yields of T2 and T4 treatments were 1 909 .31 kg/hm2 and 2 134 .91 kg/hm2 , which were higher than those of T1 and T3 by 5 .21%and 7 .13% , respectively . The output values of T2 and T4 were 29 460 .69 Chinese Yuan/hm2 and 35 162 .05 Chinese Yuan/hm2 , higher than those of corresponding controls ( T1 and T3 ) by 3 .84% and 8 .72% , respectively . For chemical composition , the mixed application of EM and soil amendments increased the contents of nicotine , potassium and chlorine , but decreased the content of total sugar in flue‐cured tobacco leaves . Furthermore , the mixed application of EM and soil amendments reduced the Schmuck value and the ratio of total sugar to nicotine , increased the ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar . The treatments with EM and soil amendments enhanced the sensory quality of flue‐cured tobacco leaves , and the total scores of T2 and T4 increased 2 .30 and 2 .67 , respectively , compared with the corresponding controls ( T1 and T3 ) .
<br> In a word , the mixed application of EM and soil amendments shows practical value not only in improving the grade of the flue‐cured tobacco leaves , but also improving their yields and quality .