CAJ | 학술논문

卡尔纳普的意义证实理论试图说明科学陈述如何具有主体间可理解的经验意义。在逻辑上，卡尔纳普将主体间的物理学语言作为统一的科学语言，这表明语言的主体间性是由逻辑规定而成；在经验上，他认为语言系统的基本谓词———可观察谓词为科学陈述提供经验内容，并用事物语言来说明可观察谓词的主体间性，事物语言恰恰是日常生活中使用的语言。可见，卡尔纳普试图用逻辑学解决语言的主体间性问题，同时也摆脱不了日常语言的印迹。
잡이납보적의의증실이론시도설명과학진술여하구유주체간가리해적경험의의。재라집상，잡이납보장주체간적물이학어언작위통일적과학어언，저표명어언적주체간성시유라집규정이성；재경험상，타인위어언계통적기본위사———가관찰위사위과학진술제공경험내용，병용사물어언래설명가관찰위사적주체간성，사물어언흡흡시일상생활중사용적어언。가견，잡이납보시도용라집학해결어언적주체간성문제，동시야파탈불료일상어언적인적。
Carnap’ s verification theory of meaning tries to illustrate how scientific statements have intersubjective and empirical meaning. On logic, Carnap takes physical language which is intersubjective as the unified scientific language. This shows intersubjectiv?ity is stipulated by logic. On empirical,Carnap thinks observable predicates of linguistic system offer the empirical contents for scientific statements. And he explains the intersubjectivity of observable predicate by thing-language. Thing-language is used in ordinary life. Thus Carnap tries to solve the problem of intersubjectivity by logic, but cannot cast off ordinary language absolutely.