CAJ | 학술논문

在特大城市人们对市民权享有基础所持的权利观念是一个重要研究议题。理论上，基于户籍的市民权是一种集体特权，而基于贡献的市民权是一种个体特权，均与宪法意义上的公民权存在差别，这构成了户籍制度和地域流动背景下的多元权利观念及冲突。调查发现，人们普遍认同市民权是特权而非公民权，但对市民权是否户籍权的意见并不一致，因此将市民权与户籍简单挂钩的做法值得商榷，但强调权利义务对等原则的市民权赋权逻辑具有较高的民意基础。虽然“土客”都认同市民权是一种特权，但存在着集体特权和个体特权的冲突，需要解决哪一种权利有优先性的问题。从影响因素看，制度、移民和市场身份都显著影响人们对市民权权利基础的态度。
재특대성시인문대시민권향유기출소지적권리관념시일개중요연구의제。이론상，기우호적적시민권시일충집체특권，이기우공헌적시민권시일충개체특권，균여헌법의의상적공민권존재차별，저구성료호적제도화지역류동배경하적다원권리관념급충돌。조사발현，인문보편인동시민권시특권이비공민권，단대시민권시부호적권적의견병불일치，인차장시민권여호적간단괘구적주법치득상각，단강조권리의무대등원칙적시민권부권라집구유교고적민의기출。수연“토객”도인동시민권시일충특권，단존재착집체특권화개체특권적충돌，수요해결나일충권리유우선성적문제。종영향인소간，제도、이민화시장신빈도현저영향인문대시민권권리기출적태도。
In big cities,people’s attitude towards ideas of citizenship’s basis is an important subject. Theoretically,it is a kind of collective privilege when citizenship is based on the Hukou and individual privilege when based on contributions.Both of them are different from citizenship as stipulated in the national constitution.Thus,there emerge multiright and their conflicts in the dual context of Hukou institution and migration on a large scale.Statistics show that people universally agree that citizenship is a kind of privilege instead of universal right.But people have not reached a consensus on whether citizenship is a kind of Hukou privilege.So it is questionable that citizenship must be based on Hukou,whereas the notion that citizenship needs a kind of equity is quite well accepted among the general public.Although the logic of privilege has been accepted,there are conflicts between the collective privilege and the individual privilege as well as the question of which privilege is prior. Nowadays,the Hukou institution,identity of the migrant and individual performance in the market all influence considerably people’s attitude towards ideas about citizenship.