中华肾脏病杂志
中華腎髒病雜誌
중화신장병잡지
2015年
8期
579-582
,共4页
于海波%姜埃利%魏芳%王立华%董红业%陈海燕%毕学青%王喆%孟甲
于海波%薑埃利%魏芳%王立華%董紅業%陳海燕%畢學青%王喆%孟甲
우해파%강애리%위방%왕립화%동홍업%진해연%필학청%왕철%맹갑
肾透析%血管通路%流行病学
腎透析%血管通路%流行病學
신투석%혈관통로%류행병학
Renal dialysis%Vascular access%Epidemiology
目的 调查天津市维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者不同血管通路的应用及主要并发症发生率.方法 选取在天津市三级甲等医院行MHD治疗的患者为调查对象,收集患者一般情况、透析龄、血管通路类型和使用时间、并发症及出现时间等资料.共采集到2651份有效病例,依据血管通路的不同分为动静脉内瘘组和隧道型导管组,分析两组患者的临床资料及主要并发症的特征.结果 MHD患者中自体动静脉血管内瘘使用率最高[2047例(77.22%)],带Cuff的隧道型半永久中心静脉导管(隧道型导管)为559例(22.59%),移植血管的使用率较低[5例(0.19%)].首次透析通路使用不带Cuff非隧道型临时中心静脉导管(临时导管)比例较高[2484例(93.70%)].相比动静脉内瘘组,隧道型导管组前4年的血栓形成、感染等并发症发生率较高(P=0.003).结论 自体动静脉内瘘仍是MHD患者的首要选择,使用的比例较高,隧道型导管次之.首次透析使用临时静脉导管比例较高,需加强慢性肾功能不全后期的管理,适时建立长期透析通路.
目的 調查天津市維持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者不同血管通路的應用及主要併髮癥髮生率.方法 選取在天津市三級甲等醫院行MHD治療的患者為調查對象,收集患者一般情況、透析齡、血管通路類型和使用時間、併髮癥及齣現時間等資料.共採集到2651份有效病例,依據血管通路的不同分為動靜脈內瘺組和隧道型導管組,分析兩組患者的臨床資料及主要併髮癥的特徵.結果 MHD患者中自體動靜脈血管內瘺使用率最高[2047例(77.22%)],帶Cuff的隧道型半永久中心靜脈導管(隧道型導管)為559例(22.59%),移植血管的使用率較低[5例(0.19%)].首次透析通路使用不帶Cuff非隧道型臨時中心靜脈導管(臨時導管)比例較高[2484例(93.70%)].相比動靜脈內瘺組,隧道型導管組前4年的血栓形成、感染等併髮癥髮生率較高(P=0.003).結論 自體動靜脈內瘺仍是MHD患者的首要選擇,使用的比例較高,隧道型導管次之.首次透析使用臨時靜脈導管比例較高,需加彊慢性腎功能不全後期的管理,適時建立長期透析通路.
목적 조사천진시유지성혈액투석(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)환자불동혈관통로적응용급주요병발증발생솔.방법 선취재천진시삼급갑등의원행MHD치료적환자위조사대상,수집환자일반정황、투석령、혈관통로류형화사용시간、병발증급출현시간등자료.공채집도2651빈유효병례,의거혈관통로적불동분위동정맥내루조화수도형도관조,분석량조환자적림상자료급주요병발증적특정.결과 MHD환자중자체동정맥혈관내루사용솔최고[2047례(77.22%)],대Cuff적수도형반영구중심정맥도관(수도형도관)위559례(22.59%),이식혈관적사용솔교저[5례(0.19%)].수차투석통로사용불대Cuff비수도형림시중심정맥도관(림시도관)비례교고[2484례(93.70%)].상비동정맥내루조,수도형도관조전4년적혈전형성、감염등병발증발생솔교고(P=0.003).결론 자체동정맥내루잉시MHD환자적수요선택,사용적비례교고,수도형도관차지.수차투석사용림시정맥도관비례교고,수가강만성신공능불전후기적관리,괄시건립장기투석통로.
Objective To investigate the use of vascular access and complication incidence in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Tianjin.Methods Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in the third level of first-class hospital in Tianjin were investigated.The investigate method was live interview.Two thousand six hundred and fifty-one cases were available.Basic data,age of dialysis,type of vascular access,age of vascular access and complications were recorded.The differences in clinic data and complications between patients using arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and central venous catheter (CVC) as vascular access were compared.Results There were 2047 (77.22%) patients using AVF as vascular access,559 (22.59%) patients using tunnel type central venous catheter,and 5 (0.19%) patients using arteriovenous graft (AVG) for maintenance hemodialysis.Most patients used temporary catheter as the first vascular access [2484(93.70%)].Compared to AVF,CVC had high incidence of thrombosis and infection in the first four years (P=0.003).Conclusions AVF remains the first choice for maintenance hemodialysis.Most patients use AVF as their vascular access.The second preferred choice is CVC.The management of late chronic kidney disease should be enhanced to avoid the high usage of temporary catheter.