CAJ | 학술논문

采用“学术不端文献检测系统”，对10个医学学科和综述类拟发表的1238篇论文的文字复制比情况进行分析。结果表明：复制比在0％－10％区段论文最多，共有308篇（28.44％）；除综述文字复制比与精神卫生差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）外，综述类论文文字复制比均明显高于其余9个学科（P＜0.01）；此外，护理学、基础医学、精神卫生和影像医学论文文字复制比亦均高于医学教育（ P＜0.05）；精神卫生学科论文文字复制比均高于检验医学和其他学科（ P＜0.05）。提出医学论文将文字复制比定在30％比较合理，但具体的学科文字复制比要区别对待。
채용“학술불단문헌검측계통”，대10개의학학과화종술류의발표적1238편논문적문자복제비정황진행분석。결과표명：복제비재0％－10％구단논문최다，공유308편（28.44％）；제종술문자복제비여정신위생차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）외，종술류논문문자복제비균명현고우기여9개학과（P＜0.01）；차외，호이학、기출의학、정신위생화영상의학논문문자복제비역균고우의학교육（ P＜0.05）；정신위생학과논문문자복제비균고우검험의학화기타학과（ P＜0.05）。제출의학논문장문자복제비정재30％비교합리，단구체적학과문자복제비요구별대대。
The Academic Misconduct Literature Detection System was performed to analyze the copy ratio status in 1238 papers to be published within 10 medical disciplines and reviews .The results showed that:papers with copy ratio from 0% to 10% section account for the most part , a total of 308 articles (28.44%);except for the no statistically significant difference between copy ratio in review papers and mental health ( P>0.05 ) , copy ratio in review papers was significantly higher than the rest of the nine subjects(P<0.01);in addition,copy ratio in nursing,basic medicine,mental healthand image medicine was also higher than medical education ( P<0.05 );copy ratio in mental health was higher than laboratory medicine and other subjects ( P<0.05 ) .It is reasonable to keep copy ratio in medical papers at 30%and treat copy ratio in specific subjects differently .