CAJ | 학술논문

本文首次采用行为经济学实验的方法测度了教师的公平偏好和风险态度，并对比分析了80后教师和70后教师在公平偏好、风险态度及其教学质量上的差异，进一步回归分析，检验了80后教师和70后教师公平偏好对学生评价的影响。研究结果显示：教师大多偏好公平，且为风险规避者；教师的公平偏好会影响学生对其的评价，而风险偏好对学生评价并无显著影响；80后教师与70后教师相比，其更为偏好风险，且其公平偏好较弱，但其公平偏好对学生评价的影响更大。
본문수차채용행위경제학실험적방법측도료교사적공평편호화풍험태도，병대비분석료80후교사화70후교사재공평편호、풍험태도급기교학질량상적차이，진일보회귀분석，검험료80후교사화70후교사공평편호대학생평개적영향。연구결과현시：교사대다편호공평，차위풍험규피자；교사적공평편호회영향학생대기적평개，이풍험편호대학생평개병무현저영향；80후교사여70후교사상비，기경위편호풍험，차기공평편호교약，단기공평편호대학생평개적영향경대。
The experimental method of behavioral economics was used in this research to evaluate teachers’ fairness preference and their attitude towards risks. The comparative analysis of the post-80’s teachers’ and the 70’s teachers’ fairness preference, as well as their risk attitude and the teaching quality shows some differences between them. Regression analysis was also conducted to check the impact of the fairness preference of the post-80’s teachers and the 70’s teachers on students’ appraisal of teacher’s performance. The results show that most teachers are equitable and risk-averse. Compared with the 70’s teachers, the post-80’s teacher shows greater preference on risks but less preference on fairness. Teachers’ fairness preference can affect the students’ appraisal of teaching performance while teachers’ attitude towards risks has no significant effect on that.