CAJ | 학술논문

民用飞机驾驶舱操纵器件的防操作错误设计是驾驶舱人机工程的设计目标之一。本文基于防操作错误设计措施，采用调查表调研的方式，对比研究波音公司与空客公司在客机驾驶舱操纵器件中采用的防操作错误设计措施，对防操作错误设计措施的评估分为安全帮助度与频率两个方面，通过方差分析，研究波音飞机与空客飞机有差异的防操作错误设计措施，分析差异原因，对同一防操作错误设计措施，比较年龄、驾龄、技术等级等不同因素对其效果的影响，结果表明波音客机的设计操纵性优良，空客客机的设计更加注重逻辑保护，对不同的操纵器件，随着飞行员驾龄、年龄的增长，出错的频率及其安全帮助度展现出不同的变化趋势，文章为驾驶舱的防操作错误研究提供一定的参考。
민용비궤가사창조종기건적방조작착오설계시가사창인궤공정적설계목표지일。본문기우방조작착오설계조시，채용조사표조연적방식，대비연구파음공사여공객공사재객궤가사창조종기건중채용적방조작착오설계조시，대방조작착오설계조시적평고분위안전방조도여빈솔량개방면，통과방차분석，연구파음비궤여공객비궤유차이적방조작착오설계조시，분석차이원인，대동일방조작착오설계조시，비교년령、가령、기술등급등불동인소대기효과적영향，결과표명파음객궤적설계조종성우량，공객객궤적설계경가주중라집보호，대불동적조종기건，수착비행원가령、년령적증장，출착적빈솔급기안전방조도전현출불동적변화추세，문장위가사창적방조작착오연구제공일정적삼고。
Error proofing design for controls in aircraft cockpit is one of the design goals of ergonomics . Based on error proofing design methods , the differences and similarities between Boeing and Airbus aircraft are studied by analyzing questionnaire data .By analysis of variance , the reasons for the different efforts of error proofing design methods between Boeing and Airbus aircraft are further studied .The analysis is divid-ed into two parts:the degree of security support and the rate of recurrence .The effects of age , driving ex-perience , technician grade on the same error proofing method are considered .The result shows that Boeing design has a superior maneuverability and Airbus design stresses on logical protection .With the growing of age and driving experience , the frequency of operating error has different trend for different controls .The research provides a reference for the study of error proofing methods in the cockpit .